Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs. Islanders Game 4 Sunday 1PM


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

So, no defensive player scored today? Might have been the best overall game so far.

No defensive goals and I believe only two assist. But that doesn’t detract anything from the blue lines they played stupidly good. Outside of a few chatty, ghost mishaps they just completely shut down the islanders. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The canes did not end up practicing today. Rods availability say 11:45(so probably 12:15 for him) I doubt he will say who we are drawing in if drury can’t go though. 
 

Choices ranked in my estimation of Rod,

Stromwell > Rees > Pono. Though I’d prefer Pono get some NHL time. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DavidEng said:

If some pro member who’s been here longer than I the newbie wants to start a game 5 thread, I’ve been reading various sports news sources and have some thoughts I’ll post there. My thoughts are worth two cents though lol.

We’ll see if Panthers Fan 69 posts up. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Harbingers said:

The canes did not end up practicing today. Rods availability say 11:45(so probably 12:15 for him) I doubt he will say who we are drawing in if drury can’t go though. 
 

Choices ranked in my estimation of Rod,

Stromwell > Rees > Pono. Though I’d prefer Pono get some NHL time. 

Stromwall actually didn’t get called up, I wonder if he’s headed back to Russia.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Stromwall actually didn’t get called up, I wonder if he’s headed back to Russia.

Sweden and could be, why we didn’t call him up I have no idea. He was the stat leader for the wolves. 
 

So Rees or Pono then? Capfriendly is listing rees, Ville and Suzuki on the active roster currently while the rest are “non-roster forwards” I’d like to give Pono a game, I’d be ok with Rees, Ville is too young and I’m just not sold on Suzuki. Though Suzuki did have a better year in Chicago this go round. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Sweden and could be, why we didn’t call him up I have no idea. He was the stat leader for the wolves. 
 

So Rees or Pono then? Capfriendly is listing rees, Ville and Suzuki on the active roster currently while the rest are “non-roster forwards” I’d like to give Pono a game, I’d be ok with Rees, Ville is too young and I’m just not sold on Suzuki. Though Suzuki did have a better year in Chicago this go round. 

By Russia, I mean the KHL, that’s where he was playing previously.

I’m not putting Suzuki in, guy is made of glass, there’s no reason to throw him into the lions den.

To my knowledge, Ponomarev is primarily a center as where Rees can play the wing.

If Drury can’t go and we don’t go 11-7, I’d expect Rees to get the call.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

By Russia, I mean the KHL, that’s where he was playing previously.

I’m not putting Suzuki in, guy is made of glass, there’s no reason to throw him into the lions den.

To my knowledge, Ponomarev is primarily a center as where Rees can play the wing.

If Drury can’t go and we don’t go 11-7, I’d expect Rees to get the call.

Ah gotcha. I suppose we could put Stepan back in too. I figured he was injured too if Rod didn’t play him. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...