Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brandon Miller!


 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Once again, not about Miller vs Scoot in my opinion. 
 

Teams were willing to trade assets for Scoot.  Hornets missed an opportunity to make a big splash. 

I only heard 1 team being serious .. Who else are you talking about??

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I only heard 1 team being serious .. Who else are you talking about??

Portland and New Orleans alone were hell-bent on Scoot.

If Portland had to draft Miller, Dame Lillard was gone in Portland (probably still is).

Why not create a bidding war in Charlotte for #2?  If you can still get Miller along with *anything*, why not trade down 1 spot? It’s stupidity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Portland and New Orleans alone were hell-bent on Scoot.

If Portland had to draft Miller, Dame Lillard was gone in Portland (probably still is).

Why not create a bidding war in Charlotte for #2?  If you can still get Miller along with *anything*, why not trade down 1 spot? It’s stupidity.

What are you talking about??

Portland wasn’t trying to trade up 1 pick for Scoot.. Especially when most of the league knew we were higher on Miller..

NO wanted Scoot but nobody truly know what they were offering.. 

Portland was good with getting Miller because he fits them just as much as he fits us.. You ain’t creating a bidding war when only 1 team is putting out in public they are willing to trade up..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

What are you talking about??

Portland wasn’t trying to trade up 1 pick for Scoot.. Especially when most of the league knew we were higher on Miller..

NO wanted Scoot but nobody truly know what they were offering.. 

Portland was good with getting Miller because he fits them just as much as he fits us.. You ain’t creating a bidding war when only 1 team is putting out in public they are willing to trade up..

What are *you* talking about?  Portland and New Orleans absolutely wanted Scoot (Portland rejected significant Pelican offers) and the Hornets saying they loved Miller over Scoot.

So then just make a trade with either!!!!

Hornets prefer Miller, cool.

Two or more teams prefer Scoot, cool.

Hornets have the highest pick to get either.

It’s not rocket science for the team with the  #2 (Hornets) to trade down to #3 (Portland) and get their guy (Miller) and also another pick or player.

Some of the fans in this forum (you) are just hilarious to me.  Hornets played this poker game wrong publicly.  We agree.  

 

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

What are *you* talking about?  Portland and New Orleans absolutely wanted Scoot (Portland rejected significant Pelican offers) and the Hornets saying they loved Miller over Scoot.

So then just make a trade with either!!!!

Hornets prefer Miller, cool.

Two or more teams prefer Scoot, cool.

Hornets have the highest pick to get either.

It’s not rocket science for the team with the  #2 (Hornets) to trade down to #3 (Portland) and get their guy (Miller) and also another pick or player.

Some of the fans in this forum (you) are just hilarious to me.  Hornets played this poker game wrong publicly.  We agree.  

 

 

Show me the report where Portland was talking about trading up for Scoot.. Don’t worry I’ll wait..

When you don’t find it don’t worry your credibility is safe.. lol

OH just to help you..

https://www.kgw.com/amp/article/sports/nba/blazers/nba-draft-trade-rumors-portland-trail-blazers/283-e4cba192-1a97-4e21-ad75-838a04aac25b

https://www.blazersedge.com/platform/amp/2023/6/22/23770540/mikal-bridges-trade-rumors-portland-trail-blazers-brooklyn-nets-anfernee-simons-2023-nba-draft

I can keep going if you like.. Most of Portland trade was rumors were trying to get a vet star with their pick to match up with Dame not Scoot..

Mikal Brirdges, Siakim, Lavin, and others were discussed by Portland not trading with us for Scoot..

 

 

Edited by WOW!!
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Show me the report where Portland was talking about trading up for Scoot.. Don’t worry I’ll wait..

I read this board, never post.

You’re a known troll, I’m just posting the day of the draft.

I didn’t think the Blazers were trading up for Scoot.  That’s the whole point.  They weren’t because the Hornets made it known we were drafting Miller.  It’s horrible Poker / FF game…Hornets have never had a game-face.  We always tell our hand even when we can make major moves.

 

Edited by HardcoreHokie
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

I read this board, never post.

You’re a known troll, I’m just posting the day of the draft.

Show me where I said the Blazers were trading up for Scoot.  That’s the whole point.  They weren’t because the Hornets made it known we were drafting Miller.  It’s horrible Poker / FF game…Hornets have never had a game-face.  We always tell our hand even when we can make major moves.

 

Lol.. You were talking about creating a bidding war between Portland and NO??

How does that happen if Portland doesn’t want to trade up for Scoot?? 
 

Im a troll but you are posting with no sense of logic.. 

Reality check : Portland wanted a vet.. NO was the only team publicly trying to trade up for Scoot with us or Portland.. No deal was ever a thing between us and the Trail Blazers.. 

This isn’t the NFL teams don’t usually trade up 1 pick in the NBA and give a team what they want in value…

If this was ever a thing what was Portland going to give us to move up 1 pick..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

What are *you* talking about?  Portland and New Orleans absolutely wanted Scoot (Portland rejected significant Pelican offers) and the Hornets saying they loved Miller over Scoot.

So then just make a trade with either!!!!

Hornets prefer Miller, cool.

Two or more teams prefer Scoot, cool.

Hornets have the highest pick to get either.

It’s not rocket science for the team with the  #2 (Hornets) to trade down to #3 (Portland) and get their guy (Miller) and also another pick or player.

Some of the fans in this forum (you) are just hilarious to me.  Hornets played this poker game wrong publicly.  We agree.  

 

 

Mitch said they had offers. Said something along the lines of they were offered some really good players. If they were going to trade the pick they had the opportunity to trade it pre draft. The Hornets then still make the pick and the trade is announced. Kind of weird to assume a pick swap was on the table with Portland and the Hornets turned it down. That doesn’t make sense. That’s why you’re mad it didn’t happen, because it doesn’t make sense for them to not do it if it’s available. Why would you assume it was available rather than the most likely reason it didn’t happen: it wasn’t available.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Lol.. You were talking about creating a bidding war between Portland and NO??

How does that happen if Portland doesn’t want to trade up for Scoot?? 
 

Im a troll but you are posting with no sense of logic.. 

Portland wanted Scoot BAD at #3.  Either that or a trade for vets and pics.  

Hornets could’ve jumped on that leverage but they didn’t.  Is what it is, but CLT could have done far better today.  And I like and will support Miller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Portland wanted Scoot BAD at #3.  Either that or a trade for vets and pics.  

Hornets could’ve jumped on that leverage but they didn’t.  Is what it is, but CLT could have done far better today.  And I like and will support Miller.

Jesus I just showed 2 stories showing you what Portland really wanted to do was find veteran help for Dame not another young player.. 
 

Reality check is They might be starting over and trading Dame because they had to make this pick… 
 

They did not want a trade up for Scoot.. Where are you getting this from.. 

And even if they did what were they giving up??

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Mitch said they had offers. Said something along the lines of they were offered some really good players. If they were going to trade the pick they had the opportunity to trade it pre draft. The Hornets then still make the pick and the trade is announced. Kind of weird to assume a pick swap was on the table with Portland and the Hornets turned it down. That doesn’t make sense. That’s why you’re mad it didn’t happen, because it doesn’t make sense for them to not do it if it’s available. Why would you assume it was available rather than the most likely reason it didn’t happen: it wasn’t available.

I have no clue what this dude is talking about and he can’t explain it either..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I disagree. It doesn't matter because Tepper is all in on terrible or underqualified people. He is a magnet for failures.
    • He's not coming back. I'm sure you will despite having dozens of accounts banned... including this one
    • Here’s where I go off the reservation. Don’t read if you can only endure a post that is under 2 paragraphs.    Play calling was really really weird, and it set the tone. They had no idea how to handle stunts. Passing on first down got us behind the sticks. Stunts on second/third down and the rest is history. Thielen is Mr first down and for the second week in a row, it shows how badly missed that is.  Thielen moves the chains. Chuba moves the chains. Not one single screen to Chuba. They completely abandoned the run, when it was working very well. Losing XL was the final piece. Sanders is a complete bum who checked out once he got paid.  I will say it again and again and again, Thielen is criminally under appreciated here, but very respected by defenses. Everyone is obsessed with the home run guys, but a team has to have a first down guy. Usually it’s a big TE with good hands. We don’t have that guy.  Thielen is our first down guy. He’s our check down guy who puts us in 2nd and 2. He’s our 3rd and 12 outlet. Thielen and Chuba keep us ahead of the chains. One is injured and the other was given up on. Besides those 2, we have a WR who reportedly has an attitude problem, a rookie with potential and then it’s a sea of bums and ‘who the hell is thats.’  People are really quick to dump on Andy. Long knives are out. Look, he’s been the only thing to give a glimpse of hope since Wilks. I actually still want to watch this Sunday.  So we dump Andy at the end of the season… Ok, for what then? For whom? Another stupid project? Andy’s not a world beater but he knows how to read a defense and complete a pass. He is not a project. Who would we bring in that could come close to being plug and play, that would actually WANT to be here with T as the owner.  This team isn’t even ready to draft a QB yet. He’d get killed. The receivers would grow stale and unmotivated and we’d go nowhere. Hey look another injury to a key position we have 0 depth in because we traded away more draft capital and/or murdered our cap on an oft injured vet has been.  Wash, rinse, repeat. Same old Panthers. Desperate for a savior.  This build has to be done the right way. Slow and boring. Get a hard hitting identity back again, as was advertised. Get thumpers. Trench warriors. Keep a field general around who can keep an offense alive and get a first down every once in a while. Give people a reason to want to sign contract #2 with us. Unless we can all of a sudden have a legion of boom-esque draft, our version of the 3-4 will continue to be humiliating.  Where’s the Tylenol?!
×
×
  • Create New...