Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The QB position


Peppermint9030

Recommended Posts

Lets assume Matt Moore finishes 2-2 down the stretch. What do you do next offseason? Do we keep Delhomme on the roster? Is Matt Moore the answer? Do we draft a player like a Sam Bradford? Do we let go of Mcown and bring up Hunter Cantwell? (who Fox said has promise) My personal favorite would be to somehow get rid of Jake, and our roster be

1. Moore

2. Bradford (w/e rookie)

3. Cantwell (who if sucks i will call Hunter Cant "throw" well)

With an open competition going into camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm I really think a combination of Moore, rookie and Cantwell is asking for trouble. Yes it may pay off, but you need a veteren in there somewhere as an insurance policy.

Plus I have a sneaky suspicion Jakes contract might negate any release. Unless another FO comes in, but then if they come in chances are Moore might not be around either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets assume Matt Moore finishes 2-2 down the stretch. What do you do next offseason? Do we keep Delhomme on the roster? Is Matt Moore the answer? Do we draft a player like a Sam Bradford? Do we let go of Mcown and bring up Hunter Cantwell? (who Fox said has promise) My personal favorite would be to somehow get rid of Jake, and our roster be

1. Moore

2. Bradford (w/e rookie)

3. Cantwell (who if sucks i will call Hunter Cant "throw" well)

With an open competition going into camp.

I think this would be a good lineup for a UFL franchise but would really be quite disasterous for an NFL team. With this lineup you are "hoping" that Moore becomes a seasoned leader that is capable of starting and winning. To me this is much more reckless than what the FO did this past offseason in signing Delhomme to an extension. They were "hopeful" that Delhomme would be able to bounce back but at least here was some basis for this based on JD's past ability to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless, they should draft a quarterback next year (or pick one up through free agency).

If Matt Moore plays at a decent level, then keep him around and let him start while a rookie is developed (scary thought in Carolina, I know). Jake is a horrible starter, but there is no better backup available for this team (plus we would take a cap hit by cutting him anyway).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...