Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For Our NFL Gurus


Jangler

Recommended Posts

Question 1.12

What happens if a player is traded or retires?

Answer: We already know that if a player is waived on or before June 1, the remaining signing bonus that has not been included in salary “accelerates” and is included in that year’s team salary. Acceleration also occurs when a player is traded or waived and picked up by another team. The new team is not responsible for any of the original signing bonus. The team that waived or traded the player is responsible for the accelerated signing bonus (in the same manner as described above).

In most cases, if a player retires, the remaining signing bonus that has not been included in salary “accelerates” and is included in that year’s team salary. Thus, the team will take an immediate salary cap hit of the remaining signing bonus.

http://www.askthecommish.com/salarycap/faq.asp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading... :lol: Can you call me and tell what everybody has said in this thread?

It's complicated, but there are two options we can pick up for the final two years. To not take either option results in $13.5 mil, to keep him roughly the same and to cut him roughly the same. So all in all, no matter what we do, we will be paying him that amount.

Hence why Scott and Dockery are most likely right in their assumption that he will be here as a back up next season. The contract can't dissapear, so there really is no point in cutting him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if he retires the money is gone....he will only get paid for this season..end thread

So if that is true then it brings up the old joke..."This milk has gone bad...*puts back in fridge*....maybe it will be better tommorrow."

Somebody really needs to have a truthful heart to heart with Jake...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if that is true then it brings up the old joke..."This milk has gone bad...*puts back in fridge*....maybe it will be better tommorrow."

Somebody really needs to have a truthful heart to heart with Jake...

Im no "NFL Guru" so you might want to get a more educated answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
    • Nah we just talking about giving a platform and normalizing predators (who both beat women) opinions and celebrating it if it fits your narrative.  If that's fun I'm fine being a miserable fug by not supporting P.O.S like that. N b4 you call me a libtard or some other dumb ish know I'm an Anarchist/Libertarian and believe both these dudes should get a complete ass whooping (at min) or something worse for what they have done to women in this world. 
×
×
  • Create New...