Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Battlefield: Bad Company 2

Captroop

By Captroop,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

stankowalski Newbie

stankowalski

Posted
Posted

Hope it's better than the first one. I just tried to play the first one a couple of days ago. After playing MW2 for the past month or so, it was impossible for me to get into Bad Company. I didn't like anything about it...graphics, aiming, health regeneration, and most importantly the control scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Jorts, I think it comes out March 4.

Hope it's better than the first one. I just tried to play the first one a couple of days ago. After playing MW2 for the past month or so, it was impossible for me to get into Bad Company. I didn't like anything about it...graphics, aiming, health regeneration, and most importantly the control scheme.

I had the opposite reaction. I played MW2 first, and outside of the graphics I didn't see the perks, myself. I got so bored/frustrated with MW2 that I decided to take a break for a day or two and play Battlefield. It hasn't left the disc tray since then.

The game play (in my opinion) is far superior. And I liked a lot of the little things, like the sound; the faint pops of rifle fire in the distance is much more realistic, and that your hearing goes out when a rocket explodes next to you. The only edge I give MW2 is graphics, but BFBC came out 2 years ago, so of course the graphics would be outdated. BFBC2 will have better graphics, and just from watching the video, it looks like they corrected a lot of the things I have a problem with BFBC (such as the rocket launcher class can have a rifle this time; you're not stuck with a shotgun just because you want to bust tanks).

I think this could be the MW2 killer. Of course not in sales. This game won't get anywhere near the hype MW2 did, but I think in the future it will be recognized as a superior game.

*edit*

I should qualify all of this by saying that I am referring only to the multiplayer experience. Not the single player, which I also tip the hat to MW2. But at the end of the day, that's only like 4 hours. Multiplayer is what consumes your life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
southcakalac Newbie

southcakalac

Posted
Posted

Ive been trying to get all of you COD players to play this forever. Its a far better game than COD. You actually get to fly helicopters and drive tanks, humvees and APCs.

A more realistic game also. This game also has such big maps that campers are a non factor. I'm talking maps 20 times the size of COD. Also a destructible environment is awesome. Buildings that actually blow up when a grenade or tank shell hits it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...