Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What will PSL owners do if 2011 is a lockout?


SCP

Recommended Posts

Frank and Buc are talking about this now on WFNZ. God forbid, If there is no season in 2011, what will PSL owners be forced to do? Is there anything in your contracts that speak about issues like this? Will you be forced to buy tickets like they do for the playoffs and then use that money towards the next season?

Sincerely,

CuriousPSLshoppingSCP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd imagine if there were to be no games at all (as in no replacement players), and they knew this ahead of time, PSL owners would never be charged for the year. If the lockout came after they paid, they'd be credited.

I'll be beyond pissed if there is no season in 2011. Panthers games are one of my highlights of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will not lock out until the last possible hour, so tickets will likely have been purchased by that time. A refund seems appropriate if a lockout happens but is it realistic? You don't get a refund if we don't make the playoffs. They just deduct it from next years bill. Should be interesting to see what happens. I sure as hell hope we don't have to find out though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I hope they get another contract signed soon. I don't think anyone would benefit from the loss of a football season. This is really a pivotal point for Goodell's leadership. Make or break type stuff.

And after doing some research on the current regime running the Player's Association, a lockout sounds very possible (the head of the organization is a lawyer with activist ties... not a former player... so I'd bet he's just running numbers to be greedy... not looking out for the best interests of the sport.)

Wouldn't it suck if the NFL suffered some sort of collapse from this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will not lock out until the last possible hour, so tickets will likely have been purchased by that time. A refund seems appropriate if a lockout happens but is it realistic? You don't get a refund if we don't make the playoffs. They just deduct it from next years bill. Should be interesting to see what happens. I sure as hell hope we don't have to find out though.

Yeah but the playoff bill comes in December and the next season's bill is due in April. That's only a couple of months. They can't hold people's money for over a year like that.

There must be some legal action to take if this ends up being the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Prob will give you a credit on the next year. I think thats how they do with playoff tickets.

There's a big price difference in playoff tickets and season tickets. My two season tickets are $1800 currently. Last year, the playoff tickets were around $500 for the two seats for two games. Huge difference to hold hostage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but the playoff bill comes in December and the next season's bill is due in April. That's only a couple of months. They can't hold people's money for over a year like that.

There must be some legal action to take if this ends up being the case.

I'd be interested to hear if they contact you if a lock out seems unavoidable. I am saving up to buy PSLs for the family and it would be nice to see the precedent they set in this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You get a refund on playoff tixs. You don't have to apply it to the following year. I called the year we paid and had no games....and asked for a refund and they refunded my credit card. They can't hold your money if you ask for a refund. They'll tell you it may take 4-6 weeks but you'll get it...they'll get every bit of interest they can. I told the lady that was unacceptable and that if I have to meet deadlines set by them, I shouldn't have to wait 4-6 weeks for money that didn't need to be spent. The refund was issued that week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, I do not see a lock out or strike happening. There is still to much time and both sides are not dumb enough to kill all the momentum the league has and piss off their fan base.

That being said, the teams will do as always and bill us for tix. If there are no games they would probably just credit that towards the next season. If their are scab games they better give me a discount!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...