Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your prefered smoking device??

Mayor Qumiby

By Mayor Qumiby,
in Huddle Lounge

What do you like smoking out of the best  

20 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you like smoking out of the best

    • Blunt
      2
    • Joint
      2
    • Bong
      10
    • Bowl
      3
    • Vaporizer
      2
    • Apple/ gravity bong or other homemade device
      1

Recommended Posts

Kettle Newbie

Kettle

Posted
Posted

...for me, the quality of the consumable dictates how it is consumed. I would love to be able to get the Kind all the time, but sometimes finances dont allow it. But I try to keep a minimum requirement for the quality, I have become a snob when it comes to the herb. I will go without before I blaze some of the what my bro-in-law smokes. I will pay for quality over quantity every day... I want a vaporizer, just havent seen one for less than $500, and I am not willing to spend that on my habit..er, not on a utensil for my habit...

regs are for losers...if u cant afford the good shiit than you should not be smoking period.

this is the best reason for living in the port city. i haven't seen a seed since i moved here, and it's not just called the kind. its headies, beasters and mids. i've had some bags here that were sub par for the area, but its always good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mayor Qumiby Collaborator

Mayor Qumiby

Posted
  • Author
Posted

good thread idea that someone already had. i voted bong btw, but have been swayed to think i need to get a vaporizer.

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/the-lounge/28710-choose.html

Ah damn I didn't even look to see if it was already posted my bad... But as far as vaporizers go I've only used one and it sucked it was a 'hotbox' and I didn't like it, however I can't wait to hit a valcano.. I hear they are the best

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kettle Newbie

Kettle

Posted
Posted

I myself have never had anything better than mid...

keep me in mind if you ever head this way. it took me a while to get used to the price, but the quality is worth it. in CLT a 1/2 O of dirt would be like 50, but give me headaches and a sore throat. here its usually 60 an 1/8, but there is nothing to complain about other than that.

Ah damn I didn't even look to see if it was already posted my bad... But as far as vaporizers go I've only used one and it sucked it was a 'hotbox' and I didn't like it, however I can't wait to hit a valcano.. I hear they are the best

not the first repeat thread. just search vick if you don't believe it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
j2sgam Collaborator

j2sgam

Posted
Posted

Regs were fine back in high school, but that was 1992. I havent smoked regs in years, mids is mostly what I would find when I had to look. Good mids for the daily and every 3-4 weeks the super dank comes through for the weekend sessions...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zcustom Newbie

Zcustom

Posted
Posted

Never understood pot snobs. Every time I got kind my wallet was lighter and my tolerance went through the roof. Then when I needed to save $$ I was stuck cuz I couldn't afford the kind and the regs did nothing for me.

I quit several months ago and have only smoked on RARE occasions lately and every time it's been regs and it has been NIIIICE

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kettle Newbie

Kettle

Posted
Posted

i'm a snob i guess. i've had blueberry yum yum, sour pineapple diesel, and a few different breeds of kush just to name some. my tolerance is pretty high, but the taste, smell and high are just SOOOOO much better. the high tolerance really isn't that high though on the good stuff. its when i've tried going back to regs that it seems like it. most times i've got the good, and its just a few hits into a bowl or one good rip off a bong that sets me off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Canales is holding us back

      By strato · Posted

      Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Verge
      The Hall of Fame case for two different NFC South quarterbacks

      By Verge · Posted

      Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
    • Martin
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By Martin · Posted

      100% agree, trading him would be the best possible scenario. It allows for a clean start at QB and you get something back.
×
×
  • Create New...