Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

'00 CHA Hornets vs. '10 CHA Bobcats

King Taharqa

By King Taharqa,
in Charlotte Hornets

Who would win head to head?  

16 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would win head to head?

    • 2000 Charlotte Hornets
      4
    • 2010 Charlotte Bobcats
      12

Recommended Posts

King Taharqa Newbie

King Taharqa

Posted
Posted

iw3lu8.png

2000 Charlotte Hornets (49-33)

PG-David Wesley

SG-Eddie Jones

SF-Anthony Mason

PF/C-Elden Campbell

C-Derrick Coleman

Bench

PG-Baron Davis (rookie season)

SG-Bobby Phills (he passed 1/12/00, RIP)

SG-Ricky Davis

SF-Eddie Robinson (rookie season)

PF/C-Brad Miller

C-Todd Fuller

Head Coach

Paul Silas

b5snq1.png

2010 Charlotte Bobcats (21-19 as of 1/21/10)

PG-Raymond Felton

SG-Stephen Jackson

SF-Gerald Wallace

PF-Boris Diaw

C-Nazr Mohammed

Bench

PG-DJ Augustin

SG-Flip Murray

SF-Stephen Graham

PF-Derrick Brown

C-Tyson Chandler

C-DeSagana Diop

Head Coach

Larry Brown

WHO WOULD WIN IN A HEAD TO HEAD MATCHUP?

:cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rico6 Grand Master

rico6

Posted
Posted

Eddie Jones checking Stephen Jackson? No chance. The Bees would have an advantage inside, but Felton/Jack would be the difference.

Bobcats by eight.

That.

The inside game of the big 3 (Hornets) was bar-none compared to our inside game.

That being said Jones was known for his defense and perimeter, but checking a 6-8 Wing with handles like Jack is just asking for trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BOBCATS_BALL! Newbie

BOBCATS_BALL!

Posted
Posted

Bobcats win

but loose terribly in the logo department.. :nonod:

I didnt like the logo at first but im warming up to it now. I like the new one too, the one on center court of the arena. I also love that they got rid of the orange jerseys. Those were awful and I like the new white ones plus the pin stripe looks nice too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
King Taharqa Newbie

King Taharqa

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yeah the new jerseys are more sleek and professional looking. The new logo is flashier as well. As for the Hornets, I like the actual bee in the logo, but the font they used looks cheap compared to today's standards. I actually like the Bobcats dark blue and orange color scheme better than the teal & purple we had with the Hornets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Britneck Newbie

Britneck

Posted
Posted

That's a tough one. Before Phills died people thought we could win the east. I loved the Hornets but i never remember them dominating anyone like we are doing right now. I think i would have to go with Bobcats right now. As for the rest of the discussion.....Logo and name were better with the Hornets for me, but i love the Bobcats colors. I think we have the best colors out of every sports team. That orange and blue is sweet. The new Bobcats logo i really like though. The one that is Bobcats_Ball aviatar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...