Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A month ago the Saints were the "softest team in the playoffs"...

TheSaint

By TheSaint,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Saints are soft......the Vikings had NO problem moving the ball on the soft Saints. The Colts ground game is horrible and they will be able to run the rock. The Saints D is soft..........taking cheap shots or being aggressive going after a QB and not paying attention to where the ball is doesn't change the fact turnovers are the only hope of that D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheSaint Newbie

TheSaint

Posted
  • Author
Posted

why the hell do u loser ass saints fans still come on this board and bother us? we dont care about your opinions, or what your team has done. GTFO

mainly to watch you melt down.

you care, and you care deeply.

Now put your shirt on, and sit down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheSaint Newbie

TheSaint

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Saints are soft......the Vikings had NO problem moving the ball on the soft Saints. The Colts ground game is horrible and they will be able to run the rock. The Saints D is soft..........taking cheap shots or being aggressive going after a QB and not paying attention to where the ball is doesn't change the fact turnovers are the only hope of that D.

yeah yeah, just like AZ was gonna dismantle us...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Greg beats Brady for Sportscasting Emmy

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      I liked him when he was at Michigan because I'm a Wolverine homer. After that... 
    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
×
×
  • Create New...