Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Lightning 7pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Harbingers said:

Right back to Kochetkov? Curious… not a lot of faith in Raanta apparently.

Or Raanta has a nagging injury too. Which I wouldn’t doubt. 

Raanta always has something wrong with him.

He got ran over in the game against the Kraken and I swear he came up with some sort of injury, he just didn’t look right.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Raanta always has something wrong with him.

He got ran over in the game against the Kraken and I swear he came up with some sort of injury, he just didn’t look right.

Which leads me to believe Freddie is still in the protocol. Thus Raanta who’s probably got a lower body is the backup by default. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Think it has more to do with Burke being reassigned. Svech and Pesce aren’t playing and if Aho can’t go then we’d be going 11-6 (that’s only 17 players); calling up Coghlan allows us to go 11-7 (a full 18 players).

I’m more than fine going 11-7 tonight with Coghlan in and then getting Aho, Svechnikov, Pesce, and Andersen back on Thursday.

If he can go at 90% I’d much rather Aho over a 100% coghlan. We don’t need to be making our defense even shittier. 
 

If it’s worse than they are letting on, I’d rather Aho take another week. Especially with Svech hopefully coming back Thursday/Friday. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walt Ruff @ Hurricanes.com

TAMPA, FL. - Trying to predict the Carolina Hurricanes' lineup on Tuesday is comparable to attempting to predict the winning lottery numbers.

Well, kind of.

You can get the Martinook - Staal - Fast line and the Slavin - Burns defensive pairing correct, but that won't land you the million-dollar recipe.

Quote

Tonight's Projected Lineup... if Aho plays

Forwards

Teravainen - Aho - Necas

Noesen - Kotkaniemi - Jarvis

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Bunting - Drury - Lemieux

Defense

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Chatfield

Orlov - DeAngelo

Goaltenders

TBD

-

Tonight's Projected Lineup... if Aho does not play

Forwards

Bunting - Teravainen - Necas

Noesen - Kotkaniemi - Jarvis

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Drury - Lemieux

Defense

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Chatfield

Orlov - DeAngelo

Coghlan

Goaltenders

TBD

834762661_FpcxtnOXEAMbXzG(11)(11).thumb.png.53834492610bc2c72537f8a62a7af23b.png

Stumpy's Thoughts:

Did we all learn nothing last year from the Pacioretty predicament?

Don't rush these guys back from injury . It's a long ass season. And, IDK about you, but I'd rather watch Aho feeding Svech breakaways in June rather than October.

Aho, Anderson, Pesce, Svech...? Keep all these MFers on ice (for lack of a better word) until New Years if need be. He'll, Svech tore his ACL like 6 months ago, sit his ass until the playoffs if needed.

We have one of the most loaded talent pipelines in all of hockey. What better way to discern if any of them are ready, than to let them play with the big boys.

Let's be real, we already know who this team is. They will be cup contenders at seasons end. I don't think I'm going out on any limbs by predicting that.

The difference between a contender and a winner are usually those unheralded grinders and unexpected bloomers that round out the stars on the roster. A young goalie with the sophmoric confidence to turn a regular season hot streak into a historic playoff run. A 4th line winger who finds his shot playing on the top line for 10 games, scores the game winner that sends a team to the Finals.

Early season struggles/injuries are often the catalysts that breed postseason success!

All that said, I really don't like the Orlov/TDA bottom pairing.

Might as well put 5 forwards on the ice at that point. Considering the strengths of our 2-way wingers, it might be our best option while Pesce is out... lmao

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Walt Ruff @ Hurricanes.com

TAMPA, FL. - Trying to predict the Carolina Hurricanes' lineup on Tuesday is comparable to attempting to predict the winning lottery numbers.

Well, kind of.

You can get the Martinook - Staal - Fast line and the Slavin - Burns defensive pairing correct, but that won't land you the million-dollar recipe.

834762661_FpcxtnOXEAMbXzG(11)(11).thumb.png.53834492610bc2c72537f8a62a7af23b.png

Stumpy's Thoughts:

Did we all learn nothing last year from the Pacioretty predicament?

Don't rush these guys back from injury . It's a long ass season. And, IDK about you, but I'd rather watch Aho feeding Svech breakaways in June rather than October.

Aho, Anderson, Pesce, Svech...? Keep all these MFers on ice (for lack of a better word) until New Years if need be. He'll, Svech tore his ACL like 6 months ago, sit his ass until the playoffs if needed.

We have one of the most loaded talent pipelines in all of hockey. What better way to discern if any of them are ready, than to let them play with the big boys.

Let's be real, we already know who this team is. They will be cup contenders at seasons end. I don't think I'm going out on any limbs by predicting that.

The difference between a contender and a winner are usually those unheralded grinders and unexpected bloomers that round out the stars on the roster. A young goalie with the sophmoric confidence to turn a regular season hot streak into a historic playoff run. A 4th line winger who finds his shot playing on the top line for 10 games, scores the game winner that sends a team to the Finals.

Early season struggles/injuries are often the catalysts that breed postseason success!

All that said, I really don't like the Orlov/TDA bottom pairing.

Might as well put 5 forwards on the ice at that point. Considering the strengths of our 2-way wingers, it might be our best option while Pesce is out... lmao

We Are Not Worthy Ken Jeong GIF by FOX TV

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Bunting on the 4th line is interesting but with the way Teravainen and Noesen have been playing, I can see the reasoning.

Maybe when healthy we can spread the wealth:

Teravainen - Aho - Necas

Noesen - Kotkaniemi - Jarvis

Bunting - Drury - Svechnikov

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Lemieux

 

Not really. Bunting is feed manning the top two lines and still getting goals. Ya it would cut his minutes(he’d still be on the PP) but Noesen is jiving with TT. Bunting would bring up drury’s play(or not which would suggest a trade for picks). Give it a try for a few games, especially when we have last change. As Ottawa is not a pushover at this point. See if Drury can feed bunting and vice versa to create chances. 
 

Obviously not a permanent change. Just to test the water. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Walt Ruff @ Hurricanes.com

TAMPA, FL. - Trying to predict the Carolina Hurricanes' lineup on Tuesday is comparable to attempting to predict the winning lottery numbers.

Well, kind of.

You can get the Martinook - Staal - Fast line and the Slavin - Burns defensive pairing correct, but that won't land you the million-dollar recipe.

834762661_FpcxtnOXEAMbXzG(11)(11).thumb.png.53834492610bc2c72537f8a62a7af23b.png

Stumpy's Thoughts:

Did we all learn nothing last year from the Pacioretty predicament?

Don't rush these guys back from injury . It's a long ass season. And, IDK about you, but I'd rather watch Aho feeding Svech breakaways in June rather than October.

Aho, Anderson, Pesce, Svech...? Keep all these MFers on ice (for lack of a better word) until New Years if need be. He'll, Svech tore his ACL like 6 months ago, sit his ass until the playoffs if needed.

We have one of the most loaded talent pipelines in all of hockey. What better way to discern if any of them are ready, than to let them play with the big boys.

Let's be real, we already know who this team is. They will be cup contenders at seasons end. I don't think I'm going out on any limbs by predicting that.

The difference between a contender and a winner are usually those unheralded grinders and unexpected bloomers that round out the stars on the roster. A young goalie with the sophmoric confidence to turn a regular season hot streak into a historic playoff run. A 4th line winger who finds his shot playing on the top line for 10 games, scores the game winner that sends a team to the Finals.

Early season struggles/injuries are often the catalysts that breed postseason success!

All that said, I really don't like the Orlov/TDA bottom pairing.

Might as well put 5 forwards on the ice at that point. Considering the strengths of our 2-way wingers, it might be our best option while Pesce is out... lmao

Completely different injury and player.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BY9Franchise said:

Completely different injury and player.

Correct.

Max was never in our long term plans, so his absence didn't really hinder us in any meaningful way.

Svech's long term recovery is far more important to this team then his return this season.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Not really. Bunting is feed manning the top two lines and still getting goals. Ya it would cut his minutes(he’d still be on the PP) but Noesen is jiving with TT. Bunting would bring up drury’s play(or not which would suggest a trade for picks). Give it a try for a few games, especially when we have last change. As Ottawa is not a pushover at this point. See if Drury can feed bunting and vice versa to create chances. 
 

Obviously not a permanent change. Just to test the water. 

Bunting was brought in to be the physical presence on the Aho line though. We wanted that to be Marchment and then went after Bunting a year later. Bunting might do fine next to Drury but come playoff time it would be beneficial to have the extra grit next to Aho.

Also, Noesen hasn’t been playing with Teravainen, that’s been Bunting. Noesen has been doing really well next to KK though which is why I think he’s going to stay there for right now. But with Aho back that means Teravainen is back to the wing which pushes one of Bunting or Teravainen down. For right now it appears Bunting will be on the fourth line.

However, if the ‘fourth line’ becomes Bunting - Aho - Svechnikov then you’ll see the ice time spread out equally with out a true numbering system in my opinion.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...