Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jets waive Michael Carter


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

And you aren't acting like signing some scrub is going to mean a Superb Owl is imminent.

Have you actually watched any Panthers football this year? Or have you been too busy fanboying for the Redskins?

You notice any attempt to make any changes regardless of personnel?

 

Not at all. You're being ridiculous. If there's someone available for practically nothing who is better than our worst player at the position we should take advantage of it.

Have you seen our running game? Have you seen our passing game to RBs?

If the guy didn't go to UNC you'd be all about it. If the guy didn't go to UNC I'd still be all about it because at minimum he's better than our worst RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not at all. You're being ridiculous. If there's someone available for practically nothing who is better than our worst player at the position we should take advantage of it.

Have you seen our running game? Have you seen our passing game to RBs?

If the guy didn't go to UNC you'd be all about it. If the guy didn't go to UNC I'd still be all about it because at minimum he's better than our worst RB.

I don't give a fug where he is from. You think I was cheerleading any of the other JAGS we dumpster dove for this season from the waiver wire? I get annoyed that people think this level of player is really going to accomplished anything. I also do get annoyed when dumb college fanboys simp for "their dudes" without a lick of sense behind it other than that. The UNC fanboys are definitely the worst but this place has had to deal with Clemson fanboys, South Carolina fanboys, etc, etc. 

The fact that people are still discussing a backup player that got waived and we didn't put a claim in for is ridiculous.

You have a completely unrealistic view of this entire situation. Did you think he would waltz in here and suddenly be a star? Did you think we would somehow actually change our offense for him? Did you think our offensive line would suddenly play better?

This is an utterly absurd fantasy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...