Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting Poll


CarolinaCats

Recommended Posts

I recently saw a poll asking, "What would be the best venue for the Super Bowl in 2012?"

My first thought was Bank of America Stadium, but it is getting killed in the polls. Even Sports Illustrated ranked it as one of the best stadiums in the NFL. I may be biased so I was interested to hear what other people thought.

If you want to see the poll or cast your vote you can find it at:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This, they have weather restrictions on stadiums without domes now.....

This is true but Atlanta has a dome. The main problem with 2000 was the cost and headaches at the airport. Atlanta airport was ill prepared for the ice storms and didnt have enough deicing fluid and deicing capabilities. For all those corporate big wigs flying in it cost them twice as much than expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, whoever made that poll is an idiot. And the idiots who filled out that poll are idiots.

Green Bay? Pittsburgh? Denver? Those are actual choices? Do you have any idea how could those places are in February? Do you know anything about sports? There is no way they will ever host a Super Bowl. There aren't even any tropical climates to choose from in that poll! Hell you could have had "London" and probably would have a better chance of being right.

And Seattle is the runaway winner? Is that site based in the Northwest? It must be homers, because if our nations teens actually believe that Seattle in February would be a great place for a Super Bowl, then our nation has a very dark future indeed.

You fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, whoever made that poll is an idiot. And the idiots who filled out that poll are idiots.

Green Bay? Pittsburgh? Denver? Those are actual choices? Do you have any idea how could those places are in February? Do you know anything about sports? There is no way they will ever host a Super Bowl. There aren't even any tropical climates to choose from in that poll! Hell you could have had "London" and probably would have a better chance of being right.

And Seattle is the runaway winner? Is that site based in the Northwest? It must be homers, because if our nations teens actually believe that Seattle in February would be a great place for a Super Bowl, then our nation has a very dark future indeed.

You fail.

This is the guy's (gal's) first post on the site, and it's no coincidence it links to an outside site that they're trying to promote.

I didn't give them the satisfaction of visiting the site. Threads like this will pop up pretty frequently. There was one not long ago in which someone was asking for stadium photos, but trying to get people to visit their site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the guy's (gal's) first post on the site, and it's no coincidence it links to an outside site that they're trying to promote.

I didn't give them the satisfaction of visiting the site. Threads like this will pop up pretty frequently. There was one not long ago in which someone was asking for stadium photos, but trying to get people to visit their site.

Oh, I know exactly what they are doing, I'm just trying shiz on them for wasting our time with their crap.

We should get everyone on the Huddle to visit their site at the same time and crash their server. They want traffic? Oh, we'll give them traffic. The Capital Beltway at 5:30!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...