Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per XM NHL RADIO


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Harbingers said:

That basically confirms to me we aren’t getting Freddie back for the foreseeable future if at all. ~5 million is our max number if we can move Raanta without dealing another piece. 

 

Interesting given the fact the Hurricanes said Thursday Freddie was working his way back and close to returning to practice. This was stated by Steve Levy on ESPN+ during last night's game just prior to puck drop.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Who are the trade candidates? I'm going Pesce, Drury and Raanta. Not all 3 in a deal obviously, but I can see the list of possibles if someone asked.

Drury raanta Tony D. Necas was really good on that 4th line so he is out. Pesce is too valuable. We just need league average. 
 

maybe a draft pick?  We can score now. We have those guys. Just a goalie. That’s all. 

Edited by Panthers Fan 69
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Pesce is too valuable.

Tony D might be too toxic at his salary.

Pesce was being shopped before the season. No reason to think he's off the market now, especially as he and Skjei are both UFAs after the season. Chatty is ready for a promotion and could easily slip into the second pair with Skjei. Then you have Orlov and TDA as the 3rd pair (although that could be disastrous).

Edited by Anybodyhome
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Interesting given the fact the Hurricanes said Thursday Freddie was working his way back and close to returning to practice. This was stated by Steve Levy on ESPN+ during last night's game just prior to puck drop.

Huh, I missed that. I don’t imagine us moving anything if Freddie is coming back. Maybe people in the building are just being hopeful but man, blood thinners are a professional athlete killer. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Huh, I missed that. I don’t imagine us moving anything if Freddie is coming back. Maybe people in the building are just being hopeful but man, blood thinners are a professional athlete killer. 

Not always, Stamkos came back from his clot.

Albeit, I’d retire if I was Freddie. Being on blood thinners while playing a sport where guys are flying around with knives on their feet isn’t exactly something I’d sign up for.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Not always, Stamkos came back from his clot.

Albeit, I’d retire if I was Freddie. Being on blood thinners while playing a sport where guys are flying around with knives on their feet isn’t exactly something I’d sign up for.

Plus the bruising from 100 mile pucks being slung at you 30 times a night. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Plus the bruising from 100 mile pucks being slung at you 30 times a night. 

I also don’t think Stamkos is on thinners. His clot was caused by organs pressing on veins, it was corrected with surgery. Vasilevsky actually suffered from the same issue.

Not sure if Freddie has this issue or something entirely different.

Edit - He actually is on blood thinners. Dangerous game to be playing.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Anywho, I’d call up Anaheim and see what they want for Gibson.

If something like a first round pick, Raanta, and Ponomarev/Suzuki can get it done then I’d probably do it. If the Ducks ask for Nikishin, Morrow, or FUS then I’d pivot to Mrazek and see if he could be had for a third or fourth round pick.

Hell no to Mrazek. He is done and gives you the same and Koochie. Gibson is very interesting though. What about MAF?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Hell no to Mrazek. He is done and gives you the same and Koochie. Gibson is very interesting though. What about MAF?

Mrazek is way better than MAF.

Mrazek has proven success with our team, system, and defense. He also has a .900 on a bad Blackhawks team which is way better than what Raanta and Kochetkov are putting up on a good Carolina team.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...