Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SAT Night Games?


Pantha-kun
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Was kinda hoping the Steelers would get blown out. Would have love to see if Mike Tomlin became a real option as next HC.

“But he only wins 9 games most years.”

We’d win the South or Wildcard most years with 9 wins.  Ron won it with 7 wins in 2014.

In 9 years, Ron won nine games 3 (!) times and a bunch of horrible years mixed in.  And that was with Cam Newton.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also love that the hot topic for the late game is how the Bills offense is suddenly thriving with Joe Brady at OC.

Bills fans are worried a team might poach him this offseason.

The list of players and coaches that “suck” at Carolina and then excel elsewhere is nauseating.  

And I still root for every one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

“But he only wins 9 games most years.”

We’d win the South or Wildcard most years with 9 wins.  Ron won it with 7 wins in 2014.

In 9 years, Ron won nine games 3 (!) times and a bunch of horrible years mixed in.  And that was with Cam Newton.

Or, how “Tomlin can’t keep control of his team”, yet those same ppl wanna still follow the Steelers model lol. They still want Colbert

Edited by AggieLean
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

I also love that the hot topic for the late game is how the Bills offense is suddenly thriving with Joe Brady at OC.

Bills fans are worried a team might poach him this offseason.

The list of players and coaches that “suck” at Carolina and then excel elsewhere is nauseating.  

And I still root for every one of them.

Some of us realized at the time that Brady was getting scapegoated. I'm honestly surprised it took him this long to get another shot and I'm not surprised he suddenly had Allen and the Bills' offense looking better.

The Panthers have pretty much made the wrong decision at ever given opportunity under David Tepper. 

I said when we fired Brady that if you gave me a chance to invest in Rhule's NFL future or Brady's NFL future I'd go all in on Joe Brady's.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AggieLean said:

Or, how “Tomlin can’t keep control of his team”, yet those same ppl wanna still follow the Steelers model lol 

He kept control of Antonio Brown.

Something that Bill Belichick, Jon Gruden, Mike Mayock, Bruce Arians, and Tom Brady couldn’t do.

Mike Tomlin is one of the greatest ever.  I don’t love the Steelers but I’d like to see him retire as a Steeler.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Some of us realized at the time that Brady was getting scapegoated. I'm honestly surprised it took him this long to get another shot and I'm not surprised he suddenly had Allen and the Bills' offense looking better.

The Panthers have pretty much made the wrong decision at ever given opportunity under David Tepper. 

I said when we fired Brady that if you gave me a chance to invest in Rhule's NFL future or Brady's NFL future I'd go all in on Joe Brady's.

It was obvious he was an up and coming talent in a bad situation.  HC on the hot seat, young unproven OC is your first one to go.

He’s gonna be good, we should bring him back before someone else wises up. (He won’t come back to this mess)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, because I've been here staunchly defending Trubisky at every step.

Oh wait...

You sure have for Howell lol but you do the same post every week and are quiet when that backup QB shows why they are a back up….Dobbs…Browning…etc

i will say this, Bryce has his criticisms but damn dude you have thrown him to the fire Clausen style with the way you talk about him.

Edited by Panthercougar68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

You sure have for Howell lol but you do the same post every week and are quiet when that backup QB shows why they are a back up….Dobbs…Browning…etc

i will say this, Bryce has his criticisms but damn dude you have thrown him to the fire Clausen style with the way you talk about him.

No one not named David Tepper wouldn't trade Bryce Young for Sam Howell straight up right now. One guy has shown NFL level talent, the other hasn't. It's really that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No one not named David Tepper wouldn't trade Bryce Young for Sam Howell straight up right now. One guy has shown NFL level talent, the other hasn't. It's really that simple.

That’s like…your opinion man…but what you believe and the rest of the league thinks is not the same. I know you watch Washington games (because of the unc dude) but they have fans throwing him to the wolves and want a new qb too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

That’s like…your opinion man…but what you believe and the rest of the league thinks is not the same. I know you watch Washington games (because of the unc dude) but they have fans throwing him to the wolves and want a new qb too. 

Who has shown more promise and more ability?

It's really that simple.

I'll ride with Howell. But that's not what you tried to say. You tried to insinuate I do this with every UNC player and it's demonstrably false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Who has shown more promise and more ability?

It's really that simple.

I'll ride with Howell. But that's not what you tried to say. You tried to insinuate I do this with every UNC player and it's demonstrably false.

The unc thing is me being petty I will say that but you go down guns a blazing for a 2nd year guy with a decent cast of people vs a rookie on the team you root for that wasn’t even given a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...