Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

North Carolina braces for potential 42.2% rise in homeowners' insurance costs


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yeah, it's a negotiation ploy.

In a statement following Causey’s announcement, NC Rate Bureau Chief Operating Officer Jarred Chappell said, “This is an expected step, and part of the rate filing process. It doesn’t preclude settlement talks, and many rate negotiations have been settled before the hearing date arrives."

Last time around they were asking for like 25% and settled for about 8%. Shoot for the moon and hope you land in the stars. They'll probably end up getting about 15%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Admittedly I don't read the details, but didn't they originally ask for much higher amounts the last couple of times, and what they got ended up being less than half of what they originally requested?

Yes this is what I was alluding to earlier.

One reason the request is likely so high is because the requests keep being denied. If every 3 years you demonstrate that you need X and only get half of X then it snowballs due to inflation.
And construction cost inflation is 10% per year.

And remember that a rate increase for a policy written on 1/1/2024 might be to pay a claim that settles in 7 years

What the head of the DOI (an elected official) is doing is trying to give insurance companies just enough increase to survive while keeping consumers happy enough to keep buying insurance. The question is where do insurance companies find the extra money if they can't get the rate they want.

The answer is cutting employee expenses for one. Then you get rid of insureds that lose you money. That's why your company drops you if you have a claim that isn't your fault.

The next options are not good. Denying claims or eventually exiting the state although there are significant barriers to exit. 

What all this isn't is just a negotiation tactic. You can't just submit a frivolous rate request. It will get thrown out. The DOI rejects any little thing that isn't mathematically sound.

Filings are public. Attached is a sample:

image.thumb.png.6b7e5da609ab23327033f0e656087f52.png

Mike Causey knows that 42% is likely a real number and he also knows he can't approve it. Tough job and it's all likely unsustainable.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's the life side from 2022.
For P&C:

Quote

The net worth for State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ended the year at $131.2 billion compared with $143.2 billion at year-end 2021 and $126.1 billion at year-end 2020. The change during 2022 includes a noteworthy decrease in the value of the P-C companies’ unaffiliated stock portfolio, driven by decreases in the U.S. equities market, along with the P-C group of companies pre-tax operating loss. The State Farm P-C group of companies reported earned premium of $74.3 billion and a combined underwriting loss of $13.2 billion. This result compared to an underwriting loss of $4.7 billion on earned premium of $67.2 billion in 2021, along with $401 million in dividends to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company policyholders. The 2022 underwriting results reflect significantly higher auto lines incurred claims as well as higher homeowners non-catastrophe incurred claims and another year of catastrophe activity across the country. The 2022 underwriting loss, combined with investment and other income of $4.9 billion, resulted in a P-C pre-tax operating loss of $8.3 billion.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sorry, can't pity them. Insurance companies happily take your money and then when it's time to pay up here comes the bullshit. Their books look just fine. If they start laying off rank and file workers, it'll be to pay out more dividends not because they're struggling to survive.

I have had to file claims and never really had much of a problem getting them to pay.  They usually do what they are supposed to.  My stepfather passed away a couple of years ago, and they paid his 30,000-life insurance in about 3 weeks.  My brother in-law died of cancer last month, and my sister's 400,000 policy payment is being processed.  Had to file a claim on my house for some ice damage about 20 years ago, they paid up quickly.  Had to provide a lot of paperwork, but they were very helpful in both situations.  

 

 

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...