Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Class 2011


Recommended Posts

So, what happens with the 2011 draft class if there is a lockout? Do they sit out with the rest of the players and lose entirely a year of experience, cross the lines and play with the scabs anyway becoming an outsider on their teams and risking embarassment if they can't hack it on the horrible teams, risk injury and find a way to stay in college another year and bloat the 2012 draft class, or just give up on atheletics entirely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what happens with the 2011 draft class if there is a lockout? Do they sit out with the rest of the players and lose entirely a year of experience, cross the lines and play with the scabs anyway becoming an outsider on their teams and risking embarassment if they can't hack it on the horrible teams, risk injury and find a way to stay in college another year and bloat the 2012 draft class, or just give up on atheletics entirely?

Yea, the number one overall pick will just say fug it, I am gonna go work at Best Buy for the rest of my life because of a lockout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Number one in 2011 might only be worth being an UDFA after a year with no playing and a whole new class of younger prospects to contend with right off the bat.

WTF??? your saying is the #1 pick this year (Suh, Bradford etc.) Will be less valuable next year then Mr. Insignificant of 2011?? If I read this right by your logic Peyton Manning (1998 #1 pick) had less value in 1999 then Jim Finn (last pick in 1999.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTF??? your saying is the #1 pick this year (Suh, Bradford etc.) Will be less valuable next year then Mr. Insignificant of 2011?? If I read this right by your logic Peyton Manning (1998 #1 pick) had less value in 1999 then Jim Finn (last pick in 1999.)

Reverse your logic. What I'm saying is something akin to a Tom Brady having a distinct disadvantage to a 1st overall from 2001 who shall remain nameless in the traditional mindset of most of the league, especially if Tom Brady had already taken a full year off from actual play. #199 a year ago doesn't look as sexy as #1 this year no matter who it is.

Edit: Trying to find a way around the filter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they aren't going to "take a year off". They'll probably train harder than usualy and possibly go to other outlets like Arena football or that newer football leage(UFL?).

If they go for the draft, they'll sign a contract with the NFL, just won't play and won't get paid like Kurb said. Would they be able to go to another competing outlet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they go for the draft, they'll sign a contract with the NFL, just won't play and won't get paid like Kurb said. Would they be able to go to another competing outlet?

good point, they wouldn't be able to go to a competing outlet but a lot of the 2nd day/UDFA's would.

Not many junior's would come out most likely.

They would probably just all flock to those bleeding edge training facilities like all of these guys do. Many tractor tires will be flipped and many medicine balls will be manipulated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...