Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Browns GM Holmgren defends decision to sign Delhomme

The Saltman

By The Saltman,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

The Saltman Apprentice

The Saltman

Posted
Posted

“My own belief is this team needs an aging veteran,” Holmgren said in response to a question about Delhomme’s age, according to the Browns website. “They need a guy who’s going to grab everybody by the throat and say follow me through that door. That’s what we need. I don’t look at him as an aging veteran. I look at his as the leader I wanted in the locker room, if in fact he’s the starter. This is not a stop gap. We want him as a quarterback to win games for us, not to manage the game and all that stuff.

http://reederstake.freedomblogging.com/2010/03/16/browns-gm-holmgren-defends-decision-to-defend-delhomme/4553/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

From Steve Reed (link)

“My own belief is this team needs an aging veteran,” Holmgren said in response to a question about Delhomme’s age, according to the Browns website. “They need a guy who’s going to grab everybody by the throat and say follow me through that door. That’s what we need. I don’t look at him as an aging veteran. I look at him as the leader I wanted in the locker room, if in fact he’s the starter. This is not a stop gap. We want him as a quarterback to win games for us, not to manage the game and all that stuff.

“We knew we were going to make changes to the quarterback and add some people to the pile. I don’t think he expected to be released. It was a little bit of a surprise and it was a surprise to me.”

Browns coach Eric Mangini, who coached in New England back in 2003 when the Patriots defeated the Panthers in the Super Bowl, said Delhomme left an impression on him that year.

“I’ve known Jake a long time,” said Mangini. “I was the DB (defensive backs) coach for that Super Bowl against Carolina. We felt pretty good going into that first half, one of the lowest scoring Super Bowls and that last 30 minutes was part of the worst coaching experience I’ve had, the way he lit us up.”

...

As for Delhomme’s struggles last year, Holmgren said, “Jake’s had a really fine career and a really bad last year; so did I. I had a pretty good career as a coach and then I had a really bad last year. Thank the Lord (Browns owner) Randy (Lerner) gave me this job anyway. I think there are reasons and we talked about why that happened.”

“Over time, he’s been a proven winner,” said Mangini. “He’s been a consistent winner. His completion percentage over the years, that’s been consistent. I don’t think it’s uncommon for a guy to have a bad year, but when you look at his body of work last year…there were a lot of good throws on that tape too and there were a lot of winning throws on that tape as well.”

Holmgren and Mangini are having to defend the decision somewhat because, per Reed, Browns fans aren't much more enthusiastic than Panther fans where Jake is concerned. Seems as though Holmgren believes Jake can follow Kurt Warner's lead and bounce back.

I wish him luck (though not against us).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AceMan Proficient

AceMan

Posted
Posted

“My own belief is this team needs an aging veteran,” Holmgren said in response to a question about Delhomme’s age, according to the Browns website. “They need a guy who’s going to grab everybody by the throat and say follow me through that door. That’s what we need. I don’t look at him as an aging veteran. I look at his as the leader I wanted in the locker room, if in fact he’s the starter. This is not a stop gap. We want him as a quarterback to win games for us, not to manage the game and all that stuff.

Wait...what?

I get what he is saying though. Jake was brought in to be a leader and motivation to the team. Too bad Holmgren used the SAME old tired excuse for Delhomme's play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

It's not an excuse. Holmgren's not in a position to have to make excuses (not yet, anyway).

He really believes it. If he didn't, they wouldn't have signed him to the contract they did.

Never know. He could be right.

(I don't think he is, but then I'm not a successful NFL head coach and QB guru, am I?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Yeah, I read this earlier. I still think it's a smart move. The Browns are exactly the sort of team that need the kind of leadership a Delhomme can provide. And if he still can't get it together, you let Wallace, Ratliff, or a drafted quarterback have a shot.

Neither Quinn nor Anderson was exactly great leadership material.

If that is what they need most, they got the right guy. I'm still a skeptic, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jasonluckydog
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By jasonluckydog · Posted

      Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • TD alt
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By TD alt · Posted

      In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...