Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Future at Runningback

shaq

By shaq,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CPcavedweller Veteran

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted
On 3/28/2024 at 7:23 PM, shaq said:

Chuba is a good back and we are lucky Matt Rhules wife made this draft pick. But, he is entering the final year of his contract. Plus it’s good to have a solid rotation of backs on hand. I think RB is a sneaky need this off-season, I would be surprised if Sanders was still on the roster this time next year(maybe he turns it around). Even Blackshear will be a free agent, drafting a RB this year sets us up with leverage of not being forced to resign Chuba. The best RB fit in my eyes for a Dave Canales offense, is a quick first step home run hitting RB. Why not pair the most explosive RB in the draft with a creative offensive HC. Plus we could grab Jaylen Wright in the 3-4th round.

 

If you guys wanna check out the video I made about Jaylen Wright it’s linked below!

 

 

Doesn’t matter who the running back is if the offensive line and scheme are trash. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Veteran

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Chuba is not a bad football player. He just isn't a good one either. 

Very average.

The fact he has been able to produce behind the offensive line we have while $24 million Miles Sanders couldn’t should tell you what you need to know about his potential. He was a monster at Oklahoma State, he’s been a monster in Charlotte despite having one of the worst offensive lines in the NFL in 2.5 of his 3 seasons. That got figured out under Wilks but, Tepper gonna Clemson. 
 

or something like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ProcessBlue2 Mentor

ProcessBlue2

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

The fact he has been able to produce behind the offensive line we have while $24 million Miles Sanders couldn’t should tell you what you need to know about his potential. He was a monster at Oklahoma State, he’s been a monster in Charlotte despite having one of the worst offensive lines in the NFL in 2.5 of his 3 seasons. That got figured out under Wilks but, Tepper gonna Clemson. 
 

or something like that. 

The line's problem hasn't been run blocking, it has been pass protection. The same line made D'Onta Foreman and Mike Davis look good. Miles Sanders is just a bum. 

If this isn't average then idk what is. 

image.png.22361f2133681222ae4cf79ea110530c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...