Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cats' MOD Change?


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

I know KT is the Mod, but I feel like someone else should take his place.

I have been following the Cats forum for quite some time, and now it seems every single thread is all about race. I am sick of it, honestly, the Cats are on the verge of getting somewhere they have never been, and I want to talk about that. It seems threads get off topic, because KT begins accusing people of being racist, and that rowdys everyone up! He should post his thoughts in Smack (or Tinderbox), where it belongs.

Secondly, there was a name change thread, that aside from it getting off track (racism), its overall message was interesting....changing the Bobcats name. I still feel this is a great topic, however, I can post on that thread because its LOCKED! (and future threads get locked/deleted) To me, it seems KT's motives do not seem to support the greater good of the Cats....

Is it just me, or am I the only one?

So I am posing this question....

Is it possible that we vote King Taharga out as the MOD?

My replacement vote would be RadioKiller, because he seems to be unbiased, and supports the Cats.:smash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Secondly, there was a name change thread, that aside from it getting off track (racism), its overall message was interesting....changing the Bobcats name. I still feel this is a great topic, however, I can post on that thread because its LOCKED! (and future threads get locked/deleted) To me, it seems KT's motives do not seem to support the greater good of the Cats....

Is it just me, or am I the only one?

The name change thread was locked because it basically just became a "spam" thread for the Charlotte Observer. I advised posters to just create a new thread anytime a new article appears. No one's done it yet, but you're more than welcome next time the Observer creates a new "name change" article. I scour the internet hours upon hours everyday looking for articles about the Bobcats and yet the only place a "name change" was discussed was on the Observer's website to draw blog hits to it. I felt at the time the CHARLOTTE BOBCATS were in the middle of a playoff run was not the appropriate time to contemplate erasing the legacy the team has been trying to build. Its still discussed over there on their forum if you want to discuss it. And racism is very much apart of the "name change" discussion whether you want to admit it or not.

You do realize without me bitching to Zod 5 years ago, there's a great chance this forum wouldnt even be in here? Yet because I go at the Charlotte Observer and voice the concerns of Bobcats fans Im no longer capable of being a mod? In 5 years in this forum I have closed 2 threads, 1 being the "name change" thread, the other the "ex-bobcats" thread which I quickly re-opened in moved to the Tinderbox. Compared to the other mods on this board the past 5 years, thats light duty. And no matter how passionately I objected to someone on this forum Ive never had them banned or even asked for them to banned. While I welcome anyone to support your movement if they feel the need, I challenge anyone on this board to name a poster who's contributed more to this forum than me.

So once again, the Charlotte mentality, if we dont like what you're saying we want to "vote you out" or "ban" you. I think thats why so much animosity over Bob Johnson, there was no one to "vote him out" or tell him "no you cant do that" and its built up resentment. If I had to black out Jerry Richardson to root for the Panthers, I would feel very conflicted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And racism is very much apart of the "name change" discussion whether you want to admit it or not.

BS!! People want the name change because it a terrible name for a team & the fact it was named after BJ's first name. Racism has nothing to do with wanting name change. They just want a better name that isn't named after an owner. You won't admit that instead. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...