Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte is adding another light rail line


Lame Duck
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, travisura said:

This line is going to be a commuter rail line, not a light rail line. This line will have basically have only one goal, which is to bring people into uptown from the suburbs to the north, and send them back to the burbs at the end of the day. I think every station will have a park-and-ride lot, intended to incentivize commuters to not drive their vehicle all the way into uptown. This will ideally lead to cars making shorter trips, less cars on the road, and a less congested uptown. While I believe that in an ideal world, there would not be a need for a car at any point in a trip, this is a good step for a city building out its public transportation.

Also, I don't understand the disdain for this being funded by taxes. This is the type of project that taxes should pay for, and unless it's being privately funded by a corporation (a terrible idea for transit), then it has to be taxpayer funded.

There’s already line not too far away and most folks who work in uptown live East and South, not North.  So who are they going to commute to Uptown?  It will likely be another fail just most other things city planners do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Lame Duck said:

There’s already line not too far away and most folks who work in uptown live East and South, not North.  So who are they going to commute to Uptown?  It will likely be another fail just most other things city planners do.

Not too far away? Try getting to Lake Norman from the Blue line and see how well that goes. You should look at a map of the proposed routes. While they both technically go north, they’re serving very different corridors. 

Nobody comes from the Lake Norman area to uptown? Have you seen 77 at rush hour? Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, travisura said:

Not too far away? Try getting to Lake Norman from the Blue line and see how well that goes. You should look at a map of the proposed routes. While they both technically go north, they’re serving very different corridors. 

Nobody comes from the Lake Norman area to uptown? Have you seen 77 at rush hour? Lol.

Yea but how convenient is that to have two lines go north plus toll lanes while no one else gets anything?  East and South also projected to grow more than twice as fast as North on latest Mecklenburg projection data.  I drive from uptown in all directions.  I can get on I77 toll lane zoom thru to lake Norman no problem.  I literally get stuck and stop and gone to East and South with no way around.  Do we need to spend poo ton of money again to help North while the growth and traffic issues are all East and South?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lame Duck said:

Yea but how convenient is that to have two lines go north plus toll lanes while no one else gets anything?  East and South also projected to grow more than twice as fast as North on latest Mecklenburg projection data.  I drive from uptown in all directions.  I can get on I77 toll lane zoom thru to lake Norman no problem.  I literally get stuck and stop and gone to East and South with no way around.  Do we need to spend poo ton of money again to help North while the growth and traffic issues are all East and South?

I mean I’m all for putting light rail lines all over the city. I’m also not against a commuter rail up the 77 corridor, which you seem to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, travisura said:

I mean I’m all for putting light rail lines all over the city. I’m also not against a commuter rail up the 77 corridor, which you seem to be. 

I’m against when it comes at cost of pulling light rail East when north already have one and East have none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Zaximus said:

No silver line is a terrible idea with the amount of traffic coming from Union. 

And that area is beyond booming.  They redeveloped a ton along Monroe Rd hoping for Silver line.  Then they could connect South Blvd to Silver line via Fairview Rd which is only few miles.  That would connect East, South, and North.  I guess it makes too much sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Going from the 32nd to 27th ranked QB is a huge achievement indeed.
    • I do expect the offense to fall back to earth next year if everything stays the same.  It is kinda like how the Panthers and even now the Chiefs won in the past.  Winning many close, coin flip games.  It never lasts from season to season usually. 
    • Biased is one way of putting it. The NFL is an entertainment product in the strictest legal sense. Although I might yell it out on game days, I do not believe the games are outright “rigged” meaning there is one team that is going to win no matter what happens. It’s impossible. There’s too much variance in the game that can prevent a truly rigged game from happening unless there was cooperation from many parties involved. What I am thoroughly convinced happens is that the NFL and referees “manage” the games towards certain outcomes. And that is done primarily through referee crew choice however I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more going on behind the curtain.  The NFL uses the officials statistical tendencies to call penalties is to keep games close to drive user engagement. For example, If a crew tends to call more false start penalties, and there’s a game between a heavy pass offense where the NFL would like to manufacture a close game where it might have potential to be a blowout, then they’ll assign a crew that will slow that offense down and keep the game close.  There is an insane amount of marketing and now sports betting money that is married to the NFL economic ecosystem. To think this whole system is fair when the referee union has no outward accountability structure for poor performance is just naive. It’s closer to the WWE than outward appearances suggest, but it’s not a fully scripted outcome either. So for those who say “stop watching” if you don’t want to watch a “rigged” game, it’s an entertainment product. You can still be entertained by it, even if it’s not as fair as a truly merit based sporting event. 
×
×
  • Create New...