Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2011 Ford Mustang GT: First Burnout of the 5.0


Jangler

Recommended Posts

I love the early Camaros and have grown to really like the new ones...but I have to admit, I am a Mustang lover too! I heard the 5.0 is back and I'd love to drive one! I bought a brand new GT right off the truck in 1988 and I loved that car! My little project right now is a 90 LX with the 5.0 in it...and damn that thing likes to go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the early Camaros and have grown to really like the new ones...but I have to admit, I am a Mustang lover too! I heard the 5.0 is back and I'd love to drive one! I bought a brand new GT right off the truck in 1988 and I loved that car! My little project right now is a 90 LX with the 5.0 in it...and damn that thing likes to go!

I always wanted a '90 or '91 LX 5.0... maybe one day as a fixer upper...

My uncle had an '89 GT that he let me borrow for a weekend one time when I was 17, (no, I don't know why he was so stupid)... needless to say that was a fun weekend. I had it up to 135 in 4th gear when I backed off it not wanting to crash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always wanted a '90 or '91 LX 5.0... maybe one day as a fixer upper...

My uncle had an '89 GT that he let me borrow for a weekend one time when I was 17, (no, I don't know why he was so stupid)... needless to say that was a fun weekend. I had it up to 135 in 4th gear when I backed off it not wanting to crash.

funny...hmm...maybe I am your uncle? no...mine was a 88 and I never let anyone drive it!

I do remember, back in 88 only the GT and the Vet were the only two mainstream vehicles with 16" rubber on them. I quickly found out, after melting the first set off....them things were fuggen expensive!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bleacher Report trade and mock has us trading to 9 and picking SG Brayden Burries Charlotte Hornets recieve: Kyrie Irving and No. 9 pick Dallas Mavericks receive: LaMelo Ball, No. 14 pick and No. 18 pick The Hornets just finished their sixth season with Ball. It was only their second with a winning record, their sixth without a playoff trip and the sixth in which someone else paced them in win shares (Kon Knueppel this time around). While they'd surely like to keep building on their second-half momentum, maybe they're just unconvinced that Ball can lead a winning team. Maybe they credit that stretch run less to him and more to the addition of Knueppel, the ascension of Brandon Miller and some out-of-nowhere gains on the defensive end.   Charlotte should be dreaming big right now, and perhaps it believes a steadier hand at point guard is needed to realize that. Or maybe it feels it needs a little more time to bring everything together and thinks that task would be simpler without Ball's money on the books and with a top-10 pick in a loaded draft instead of two selections in the mid-teens.   Either way, this shakeup works. Short-term, a healthy Irving should be far easier to follow than Ball. You may not always know if Irving is playing, but you know what you'll get if he does: elite shotmaking, all-time handles, offensive ingenuity and the ability to work both on and off the ball. He could show this young roster what's required to win for a year or two (he has a $42.4 million player option for 2027-28) or even stick around longer if the partnership proves especially fruitful.   The Hornets also add a building block in Burries, who offers both plug-and-play polish and flashes of shot-creation that hint at star potential. In short, they could better their chances of winning both now and in the future while collecting both the best player in the trade and the highest draft pic
    • I'd hire him in a heartbeat. Hell if he wanted the job, I'd have Canales packing his poo right now and I don't dislike Canales. It's just that firing a 106-58 coach is crazy work. That's a 65% winning percentage. That's the equivalent of averaging 11 wins a season. That's incomprehensible for a fanbase That's never experienced back to back winning seaons.
×
×
  • Create New...