Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Uh Oh


lightsout

Recommended Posts

So here it is Atlanta Loses... Boston loses..Phili loses. Were up 3-2 with 8 seconds left... faceoff in our zone we lose... slap shot.. and manny plays the glove sloppy and it bounces off and goes in. No one scores in OT... and we lose in the shootout! Legace needs to go after this year. WE had this game and a very routine save... no one was blocking his vision and he gives it up.. He gave up all 3 on his glove... no deflections just way way of on his glove tonight. What a heartbreaker... if we dont get in by a point... it will be this game that ends it... wow. LEGACE SUCKS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why was he starting and not Cam? Paul has made a couple very questionable decisions near the end of this season putting in Legace. First he stuck with him after Peters struggled 1 night after previously playing the prior night when it was really most of the defense's fault (and don't get me started on how dumb it was sending him to Albany and keeping Legace). Now Cam is hot but he benches him in favor of Legace. I don't get what coach Paul sees in him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...