Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Andy Dalton QB School week 3


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Oakland’s defense played pretty poorly too. I think fans are just excited because there is a chance we can be competitive again on Sundays. The Bengals probably beat us, but with Dalton we probably beat bad teams more times than not IMO. I still see the 6 wins and will happily take them. 

The Bengals ARE a bad team a SB appearance a few years ago now clowds judgment 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherChris said:

The Bengals ARE a bad team a SB appearance a few years ago now clowds judgment 

They had 9 wins last year with that starting QB missing half the season. I’m not sure that would be bad not to mention they just played KC to the wire this year. They have talent, two great WRs, and a top tier QB. I definitely wouldn’t overlook them. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

They had 9 wins last year with that starting QB missing half the season. I’m not sure that would be bad not to mention they just played KC to the wire this year. They have talent, two great WRs, and a top tier QB. I definitely wouldn’t overlook them. 

No one is over looking them, I am just pointing out the facts this is the NFL last year is also irrelevant.... they lost a lot especially on defense. 7-9 teams can turn around and end up in superbowls.

Playing the Cheifs close isn't some measure of awesomeness heck the Rhule led Panthers played a better version of the Chiefs.

 

They have a bad offensive line and a horrible defense that's missing it's top 3 defensive tackles....

 

I think it's a coin toss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tennessee just fired their coach.  I guess thats good to do before he completely destroys ward.  I dont know though
    • Y'all are funny. and dumb. The argument I am seeing now if he can only be considered good if he WRs are trash or the play call has to make it hard for him? WTF haha
    • No it's not, there isn't a single coach who's only job is to win games, because no coach is going to win games unless they're also improving the quality of play out of their players. For coaches with contending teams, winning is their #1 job, but I think it's a more than reasonable take to say that coaches of not yet contending teams winning comes second to making your players better. We have 11 games left, if you gave me the option of winning all 11 of the games in terribly ugly fashion to where we don't improve the quality of our players vs we lose all 11 games, but do so in spectacular fashion where our players show significant improvement, I'm taking option B every time. Because option B is the path to future and long term success, while option A is a path to short term happiness at the expense of long term franchise stability.   And yes, that is clearly an extreme example that could never actually play out in either way, but you still know what I mean.  And no, it has nothing to do with draft position, it's about how good will these players be a year, 2 years, 3 years, etc, down the line, when you hope to be a true contending team, because nobody actually thinks we're that type of team this year unless you're literally crazy
×
×
  • Create New...