Adam thielen

[fanpanther]

He returns and young and entire offense improves.   He is clutch i misse the td non td before half replay why did they rule it no td?

[mav1234]

4 minutes ago, fanpanther said:

He returns and young and entire offense improves.   He is clutch i misse the td non td before half replay why did they rule it no td?

Bullshit is why. They didn't have an angle that showed all parts of Thielen out of bounds, and the ref claimed he lost possession going out of bounds but it sure didn't look like it from replays.

[fanpanther]

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Bullshit is why. They didn't have an angle that showed all parts of Thielen out of bounds, and the ref claimed he lost possession going out of bounds but it sure didn't look like it from replays.

All the replays i saw before i lost service i assumed was a td then when i got service back was shocked it wasnt not sure how they could not call that a td

[mav1234]

6 minutes ago, fanpanther said:

All the replays i saw before i lost service i assumed was a td then when i got service back was shocked it wasnt not sure how they could not call that a td

I think the ref made a mistake and thought he was out of the back of the end zone and then they didn't have an angle to see when Thielen was twisted away from the only 2 cameras that could see him

I'm positive it's a catch.

[Hoenheim]

It's because of how the rules work. The refs initially ruled it as an incomplete Catch, and there was not any definite video evidence of it proving that it WAS a catch. 

Every video angle they kept showing showed theilens back and not the side of him where he had the ball secured. 

IMHO, it was a catch. But Theilen could've made it undisputable if he didn't have to double clutch it to catch it before he got his knee down.