Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Injury update

jb2288

By jb2288,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted

Brooks - ACL Tear. Prob don’t see him until TC 2026 

Horn - aggravated a groin he had been playing through. Seems he could go this weekend but I’d just shut him down and get the extension done. He’s shown out this year 

Blackshear - looks like it wasn’t serious and he’s day to day. Could play this weekend with Mike Boone to be behind Chubba 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Brooks - ACL Tear. Prob don’t see him until TC 2026 

Horn - aggravated a groin he had been playing through. Seems he could go this weekend but I’d just shut him down and get the extension done. He’s shown out this year 

Blackshear - looks like it wasn’t serious and he’s day to day. Could play this weekend with Mike Boone to be behind Chubba 

 

Dan could sign a RB off another PS. Michael Carter is on AZs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Basbear said:

 

Dan could sign a RB off another PS. Michael Carter is on AZs.

It's too late in the season to bring in players if you're not in the playoffs race. They will roll with the guys they already have that knows the offense. If they get down to just 3 before the season is over it really doesn't matter anyway. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It's too late in the season to bring in players if you're not in the playoffs race. They will roll with the guys they already have that knows the offense. If they get down to just 3 before the season is over it really doesn't matter anyway. 

 

I mean that's what I was thinking with this move, 2024 is over, go with 2025 plan. Michael is only 25 and former 4th rounder. I doubt Brooks will be allowed to play in 2025, so #2 RB is on the menu. There are around 30 RBs on PS and why not try to find a young one able to fill the backup role? 

Boone is 29 years old, I surprised he's still here. I don't see how he's part of the 2025 plan or future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Basbear said:

 

I mean that's what I was thinking with this move, 2024 is over, go with 2025 plan. Michael is only 25 and former 4th rounder. I doubt Brooks will be allowed to play in 2025, so #2 RB is on the menu. There are around 30 RBs on PS and why not try to find a young one able to fill the backup role? 

Boone is 29 years old, I surprised he's still here. I don't see how he's part of the 2025 plan or future. 

I'm not even thinking that far out. There will be a major churn in the offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not even thinking that far out. There will be a major churn in the offseason. 

Yes, there's nearly a 40% turn over each year, more with new staff.

I've already look into some- 33 players with contracts (maybe 2 of more cuts) and 8 draft picks

No STs players, including the returner.

It's a decent chance to look at RB whom staff could have glowing reports in 2024 for 2025. Like the above returner is needed given blackshear is a FA. 

Got to hope/believe 2 practice squad players and 2 UDFAs make the team.

Now you're at 43+/- with around 20 million in cap space for the last 10. Dan got a hard time filling the roster, especially special teams. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...