Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 1 is done...who's left, what's needed?


KBRed

Recommended Posts

who is everyone? not me. steve smith is more explosive and way more agile. tate reminds me more of a pass catching tight end like dante rosario.

Have heard several analysts compare him to Smith. They're not comparing him speed wise, they're comparing his physical ability to get YAC.

Will all that being said, I think I like Benn better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh if we trade up for anyone I think it's going to be Everson Griffen. He is the athletic freak at DE that could ease the loss of Peppers when he brings it. So personally I think we trade up using next years first' date=' grab Griffen and then take Benn at 48...[/quote']

I like that but damn I want Tate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we trade up and get Sergio Kindle or Everson Griffin, then take best player available at the next pick. We will get a wide-out sooner or latter the key is to not reach for one, considering we blow royally at drafting them.

Oh and I dont give two shits if we trade next years first, the draft class next year is going to be horrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want Arrelious Benn but Tate would be fine.

Chances are Benn could be there at 48, thats why I'm predicting we trade our first next year for an early second this year grab Griffen and then take Benn with the 48.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tate reminds me somewhat of Smitty.

Benn reminds me of Hakeem Nicks.

...can't go wrong IMO.

We need a Hakeem Nicks more then we do another Smitty....even though I personally think Tate is going to be a bust and nothing like Smitty...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said the conservative play calling was because Canales doesn't think we can win shootouts. Yes, I did say part of that was because of the young, inexperienced receivers and that the OL is better suited for run blocking. I should have also included Young as part of the reason as well but I was responding to the post concerning "young receivers" and Thielens' absence. I am not so enamored with Young that I think all his problems are simply because of the receivers. I do think they overpaid for him and he has not lived up to the cost. He has had his struggles, as does pretty much every rookie qb thrown into a bad situation. But I have seen enough good things to have hope that he continues to get better. The OP is just pointing out how his performance late in the games when the game is on the line is one of those good things.  
    • I think it goes both ways  It could be they are used to pocket passers, not someone who constantly has to create throwing zones for himself with pocket movement  point being, whether it is Young or the receivers or the sun or the moon or the wind, can’t win in the nfl without the threat of a downfield attack
×
×
  • Create New...