Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sports Networks' Tony Moss on draft


top dawg

Recommended Posts

http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/04/24/1596787/carolina-panthers-2010-nfl-draft.html

2 - Jimmy Clausen, QB, Notre Dame (6-3, 222); 3 - Brandon LaFell, WR, LSU (6-2, 211); 3 - Armanti Edwards, QB/WR, Appalachian State (5-11, 181); 4 - Eric Norwood, OLB, South Carolina (6-1, 245); 6 - Greg Hardy, DE, Ole Miss (6-4, 281); 6 - David Gettis, WR, Baylor (6-3, 217); 6 - Jordan Pugh, CB, Texas A&M (5-10, 190); 6 - Tony Pike, QB, Cincinnati (6-6, 223); 7 - R.J. Stanford, CB, Utah (5-10, 185); 7 - Robert McClain, CB, Connecticut (5-9, 194)

Analysis: The Panthers were one of the last teams to be on the clock at No. 48, and certainly reminded the world of their presence by making a splash and taking Clausen. The Notre Dame product has his issues, but he's in a great situation for a well-run organization where he can start right away. The impact receiver that many Panthers fans (and Steve Smith) coveted came off the board in the third round, as the team tabbed the big and promising but somewhat slow- of-foot LaFell. Later, Carolina moved up to get two-time Walter Payton Award Armanti Edwards, who will almost certainly transition to wideout at the next level. Norwood fell to the Panthers late in the fourth, and could develop into a starting OLB if things go well. Hardy was viewed as a Top-10 defensive end by some but dropped mainly due to concerns over his injury history. Gettis has an NFL body, and has a decent chance of getting on the field. Pugh is a marginal prospect who helped himself by running fast at his pro day. Carolina further undermined Matt Moore (and Clausen, for that matter) by taking Pike in the sixth.

Bottom Line: Added some quality players and lots of guys you've heard of, but this team could be in major trouble along the defensive line due to its draft approach.

Grade: B-

Yes, we no longer have Pep, but we have personnel that is capable of getting after the QB, so I just don't believe we will be in "major trouble" like Moss is saying. On paper, today, if you look at the situation you might say that we may be in some trouble, but all the moves have probably not been completed. Even still, I am thinking that with further development and/or playing time, guys like Chuck, Everette and Tank may not be Angus beef, but they surely aren't chopped liver. I am also thinking that my fellow alum, Corvey Irvin, is going to surprise some critics as well, especially with his ability to get after the ball and stuff the run in the backfield and along the edges (that's if Meeks' deems him ready for battle).

Don't get me wrong, I do believe that we will probably make a move along the way, but I believe that the promise that the guys were showing toward the latter half of the season last year impressed the FO enough that they don't believe that the situation is as dire as some analysts are intimating.

I believe that the Big Cat and company have a lo of confidence in what Meeks is doing, and the direction of the defense in general, and the draft reflected those feelings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he's criticising us for adding depth at a weak position (QB), but then criticising us for not adding depth at a supposed weak position (DE). Riiiiiiiiight.

As for the loss of Peppers - much like Delhomme, I'm happy he's gone. He's a good player, but he's just not he difference maker everyone makes him out to be. With the solid rotation of talented, high motor guys we have we'll easily replace his production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i disagree. we had next to no offense outside the run. in fact it was non-existent. and im not dogging pep, but hes only 1 man. he didn't do it by himself. his abscense hurts, but my thing is, you dont go into the draft w/ no clue of your weaknesses. We had to go through a full evaluation of the roster. its possible that we will pay for not putting an Bigger emphasis on D-line, but its also possible that our coaching staff and FO are comfortable with who we have. the guys we have are more prepared than any rookie that we could have drafted. and adding UDFA are just as good at this point. the most pressing need this year was offense, which we addressed head on, and imo very well at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...