Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers answer question about team's direction


Rod Butsecks

Recommended Posts

they get a pat on the back.. even if this QB fell in their laps..

however, this philosophy is useless if you can't replace guys and let vets go before they lose value.. you gain draft picks, in turn, gain more opportunities to gain impact players..

it has taken us a long time to get to to a point where we draft successfully at this consistent level.. we've seen quite a few players leave and we've gained draft spots for them. but we still have to get better at building more value with our draft picks and replacing the ones who are expendable..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or in our case, an every other year contender...

In fairness, they've only adopted this philosophy over the last few years. It's still something of a work in progress.

Gantt believes Hurney now has "the kind of roster he's always wanted" (paraphrasing). We'll see if that pans out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think this was their plan from the get go, draft young realtively inexpensive talent, develop it and sign middle market free agents to supplement the roster. pittsburgh among others has done this for years and it's one of the reasons they are so successful. they have a philsophy that starts from the top and look for people that fit it(coach,gm and players)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...