Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marvel vs DC


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

This was originally a set and was collected in a graphic novel a few years ago:

23w8w2p.jpg

They broke it down to 11 main contests, with 6 outcomes predetermined and fan votes deciding the rest.

WRITER'S CHOICES

Aquaman vs Namor, the Sub Mariner

- Aquaman won because he cheated, something Namor was too noble to do.

The Flash vs Quicksilver

- Flash proves faster and wins, no shock since Quicksilver is kind of lame.

The Green Lantern vs The Silver Surfer

- Not even a contest, the Surfer beat his green ass easily.

Catwoman vs Elektra

- I'd bet on an assassin to beat a cat burgular. so did the writers.

Captain Marvel vs Thor

- Give it to the guy carrying a hammer.

Robin vs Jubilee

- Seriously, Jubilee? Lame idea, but Jubilee actually won (Robin has no powers).

FAN DECISIONS

Lobo vs Wolverine

- Wolverine, claws down.

Wonder Woman vs Storm

- Storm lightninged her unconscious.

Superboy vs Spider Man

- Another lame idea. No shock it went to Spider Man.

Superman vs The Hulk

- Superman. He has more powers than just strength, but on sheer strength not sure I agree with this one.

Batman vs Captain America

- The batarang is mightier than the shield.

The overall winner: Marvel, six to five.

Nothing from Iron Man or the Fantastic Four, a couple of Marvel flagships (disappointing). Also think there could have been some better matchups.

Agree with the results?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..[.nerdhat.]...

Superman vs The Hulk

- Superman. He has more powers than just strength, but on sheer strength not sure I agree with this one.

I actually have these comics at home some where.

The problem with the Hulk vs Superman was Sups just blasted him with his heat vision and Hulk passed out.

Savage Hulk is an unstoppable force of nature. He has limitless strength. SO to give Sups the win they ended the fight quickly. But an honest to goodness fight the Hulk would eventually wear Sups down. Hulk would grow stronger and stronger and Sups got weaker and weaker (he is a battery). Just like when Doomsday killed Sups.

Ironman vs Steel would have been nice.

Flash vs Quicksilver was a waste of time.

Hawkeye vs Greenarrow was one as well, but a minor fight.

Martian Manhunter vs Vision would have been a goody.

The Caps vs Bats fight was a joke and probably shouldn't have even existed.

Right after the VS series they did a combinded series where the Superhero's were merged.

Batman+Wolverine = NightClaw or some poo, was pretty badass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Superman would lose to the Hulk like he did Doomsday as mentioned earlier.

Unless we are talking about the old school Superman who was infinitely fast and strong, in which case he would crush The Hulk instantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No fuging way Jubilee beats Robin. Powers or no powers.

I don't think Storm could beat Wonder Woman either.

I figure that without any element of surprise Jubilee should be able to firework Robin's face right off in a couple of seconds.

Storm can fly and kill Wonder Woman with weather from a long distance. She doesn't stand a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder Woman can hit Storm with a car from 1,000 yards away.

And Robin has beaten villains that would eat Jubilee's heart.

Can't throw a car at what you can't see while being struck by lightning.

True about Robin, but he doesn't have super human resilience and thus can't withstand getting fireworked. In any situation that doesn't involve a fight from a medium distance he probably wins though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't throw a car at what you can't see while being struck by lightning.

True about Robin, but he doesn't have super human resilience and thus can't withstand getting fireworked. In any situation that doesn't involve a fight from a medium distance he probably wins though.

Robin wins IMO because he's more experienced, with better training, and is much smarter than Jubilee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...