Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nothing but ballsy yet reasonable predictions thread.


pstall

Recommended Posts

moore prediction is reasonable... the last two i don't see happening, ESPECIALLY number two. we are not dallas, no way that happens.

I see thomas davis making the pro bowl. i see sherrod martin becoming a tremendous force at the FS position. moore shines, steve smith has a career year.

panthers win the superbowl. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

steve smith leads the nfc in receiving yards.

panthers lose more games at home than on the road.

panthers upset the packers in the wild card game then lose to the cowboys.

why not.

i think you have it backwards. we upset the cowboys in wildcard then lose to the packers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm never wrong

Ok, but do you preserve your rep by posting pictures and gifs in the social forums? I'll go ahead and say yes you do, and if you stop making threads in the LL forum I'll kill you.

i beg your pardon

Ok, you're pardoned....except when you make a thread that links a writer or article that makes a prediction about the Panthers that eventually gets proven wrong.

:D

Sorry folks. I'm a little under the influence of half a gallon of Maker's Mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe this at all.
    • His PPG actually did go up a little in Colorado. We will see. I still sort of believe we saw pretty close to the peak of his abilities last year. Not wishing him ill or trashing him in any way. Just tend to believe we did sell high and correctly so.
    • Well, other teams also had an offseason. I honestly agree with him. Right now I have way more faith in Coker ascending then I do XL. I think it's the TE/WR group dragging us down. Plus he does mention that the list was made with WR's very much valued more than RB's and TE's(I understand the thought process). In that context, we have a very aging AT, two "wait and see" second year players(one leaning bust) and a rookie.  I really think this is a very fair rating, on paper and in the offseason. Quite frankly, aside from the aforementioned and aging AT, this is a bunch of guys still trying to prove themselves.  Then when you go to TE, it's easily a bottom 3-4 unit on paper. That is probably being extremely generous.  RB is where we make our hay. Probably a top 5-10 unit. But....he mentions early in the article that he doesn't value the RB units as much.  So, really, it's the weighting of the skill positions that is what really fugs us.
×
×
  • Create New...