Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Super Mario Galaxy 2 Review at Gamespot


Recommended Posts

10 outta 10. Keep in mind, the game doesn't release until Tuesday, so this rating is probably a little biased. But still, its only the 7th perfect score they've given out. Take it for what its worth.

Please note, if you have any sort of animosity toward Nintendo, the digital blowjob that Gamespot gives this game will make you vomit.

It may be easy to take one look at Super Mario Galaxy 2, see the same gravity-altering traps and spherical worlds from its predecessor, and dismiss this as a by-the-numbers sequel to the superb original. But by assuming you know what to expect from Mario's latest adventure, you would be doing yourself and this game a great disservice. This is not only the new standard against which every 3D platformer must now be judged, but it also seamlessly integrates so many elements from Mario's 2D roots that it stands toe-to-toe with even its genre-defining progenitors. Every aspect of this game is absolutely bursting with joy. The vibrant artistic design immediately welcomes you into this colorful world, and the catchy soundtrack deftly mixes classic tunes with new compositions to provide the perfect backdrop for you goomba-stomping, star-snatching fun. But it's the expertly designed levels that will keep you coming back, even after you've seen everything this game has to offer, just to experience it one more time. This is an instant classic that belongs alongside the best games Nintendo has ever created.

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/supermariogalaxy2/review.html?tag=topslot;img;1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fer da record......IGN also has its own review out. 10's across the board.

By now it's a given that any game in the "Super Mario" franchise is a project Nintendo takes seriously. Even last year's New Super Mario Bros. Wii, a game that I felt played it a little too safe, was still an incredibly fun throwback to what made (and still makes) the classic 8 and 16-bit installments such timeless videogames. Super Mario Galaxy 2 has a stigma similar to last year's Mario game: the Galaxy design already wowed us three years ago, so Nintendo would really have to work hard to make jaded gamers stand up and take notice.

And that's what Nintendo did.

http://wii.ign.com/articles/109/1091239p1.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wii just passed PS3 for most good exclusive titles. Only 20 more games to go to beat xbox.

It won't beat X-Box. And the thing is, Wii's exclusive's are the ONLY good games, period. The rest are horrible ports of games off other systems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its the same problem with the DS. If the game doesn't have the word Mario in its title, it simply isn't worth playing. I'm tired of games that my son can beat in about 30 minutes. At least with Mario Kart, we can do the download play and go against each other and it never gets old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its the same problem with the DS. If the game doesn't have the word Mario in its title, it simply isn't worth playing. I'm tired of games that my son can beat in about 30 minutes. At least with Mario Kart, we can do the download play and go against each other and it never gets old.

I've heard the Castlevanias for the DS are the only reason to own one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
    • They will still be a playoff team but they aren't contenders anymore IMO. They won't be able to spend like they have when they went to a SB and proved he couldn't carry a win at that level with a really good team around him. Now he is going to have to do it with less to spend around him. They just locked in to being a playoff bound team that's going to be a known speed bump for whoever will represent the NFC in the SB.
    • Hmm. I think he'll live up to it. Last year, about half of his team was on IR it seems, at one time or another. Year before, Super Bowl appearance. Year before that, playoff run after being third on the depth chart and being pressed into service. Is he one of the greatest in the game right now? Nope. No chance of that. Is he in the top 10 going into next season? Pretty good chance of that.  Would 20 or more teams in this league love to have the guy as their starting QB. Most likely so. He's a good QB who can implement his coach's game plan to a T and has both the confidence of and confidence in his teammates. That'll take you a long way in this league if you've got the right cast around you, and he does.  
×
×
  • Create New...