Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers 2010 Offensive Projections


KatsAzz

Recommended Posts

The projection below sounds about right, Although,I would bet Clausen would have more ints than 12, most rookies do. I do feel that the numbers for Moore are right on, he is a game manager, and does that well, and those numbers reflect that.

http://walterfootball.com/offseason2009car.php

Walterfootball.com has posted the following projections for the Panthers offensive starters in 2010.

QB-Matt Moore: 3,350 yards passing, 18 TD's, and 9 Int's

(they don't expect Clausen to start, but if he did, these are his numbers)

QB-Jimmy Clausen: 3,550 yards passing, 19 TD's, and 12 Int's

RB-Jonathan Stewart: 1,100 yards rushing, 16 catches (125 yds), and 14 TD's

RB-DeAngelo Williams: 1,150 yards rushing, 33 catches (275 yds), and 10 TD's

WR-Steve Smith: 87 catches, 1,300 yards, and 8 TD's

WR-Dwayne Jarrett: 51 catches, 600 yards, and 3 TD's

TE-Dante Rosario: 33 catches, 400 yards, and 2 TD's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's no way DeWill has only 10 TD's. I'm assuming thats total they are listing. he should have a couple in the passing game meaning he'll only get 8 rushing? he'll get at least 3 or 4 on long break away's so i'd guess he has at least 12 or 15 total. heck, he had 10 last season where he missed 3 games and had many drives ended by jake delhomme turnovers. how many of those failed drives would have possibly ended in DeWill TD's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was gone last year and did not see many games. what is expected of Goodson?

He had fumbling problems and in his limited action he couldn't really break away from contact. As soon as guys got their hands on him he couldn't get away.

Sutton looked like a much better RB.

However, he looks promising as a receiver. He made some nice catches in pre-season and had a nice long 3rd down conversion against the giants that was a bit of a preview to how he could contribute.

He'll get a ton of touches in pre-season like last year. Him and Sutton will be fun to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here's the thing. You compared him to Jake. Jake was signed to the practice squad out of college. Bryce was the number 1 overall. Their expectations are wildly different and so are their contracts. You can talk all you want about what a player is and where they are now and all this other mumbo jumbo, but Jake never had a 5th year option and we weren't talking about the possibility of a top 5 QB contract extension at the end of his 3rd year. What he was expected to be matters because we invested heavily at a cost of future capital, including a 2nd round pick this year, for him to be that guy. The cost to add Bryce took value from the team. To be worth it, he has to add that value back.  Actually, I don't prefer yards, TDs, or only INTs. All those stats by themselves are misleading which is why I said you have to use a lot of different stats. ADOT - Average depth of target.  Completion %. Pretty obvious until you factor in ADOT. 0-5 has a lot higher C% than 10-15%. Hang time. If a pass is in the air for 4.6 seconds vs 3.1 on a 40 yards throw, that gives a DB a lot of time to correct. Is it a loft or is it a laser.  EPA - Expected points added. A way of measuring QB efficiency on every play.  CPOE - ranking pass completions based on several factors, not just the throw.  There's obviously more, but those are the more common.  Typical stats don't show everything. You need to look all over. Looking at a stat line is lazy. That's why I said, you need to analyze everything. Once you start looking at the numbers you start looking at the player. That's why you follow numbers. They lead you places. You look at what happening when the numbers show you patterns. That's where you start finding the problems that yards, TDs and Ints won't show you.     
    • It's not relevant who wins or loses. It's about actually attempting to get better at the position.
    • Thank you. I don't understand how the Bryce stans don't see this. I've never seen a player get more hyped for doing so little. Honestly it's driving me a little insane.
×
×
  • Create New...