Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, who's winning the heavyweight title fight?

necroplasm

By necroplasm,
in Huddle Lounge

Who's gonna win?  

21 members have voted

  1. 1. Who's gonna win?

    • Brock "The Albino Gorilla" Lesnar
      15
    • Shane "The Engineer" Carwin
      4
    • Disqualification, no contest, armageddon,etc
      2

Recommended Posts

Al Bundy Newbie

Al Bundy

Posted
Posted

So much stupidity in this thread. My brain hurts.

AT LEAST 70% of the punches Carwin threw while he was trying to ground and pound Brock DID NOT LAND CLEANLY.

Brock was covering his face, kicking Carwin off and making room. He was INTELLIGENTLY defending himself. It's not his fault Carwin can't go past the first round.

What difference does it make that Brock tried to back off (run away)? Who the fug wouldn't?

The ref handled the fight well and made the right decision not to stop it so early, because Brock was never in trouble on the ground. Ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

Carwin said in an interview via text last night that Lesnar went out several times on the ground. i believe it.

Gotta love how people cry when Brock goes to work on there guy. The fact is that Carwin did not have any power after his first round of punches.Then he got put on the ground and choked out like a bitch in the second. Carwin gave up.... He tapped and that is no ones falt but his own. Brock weathered the storm and Carwin could not do it.

Carwin, got him a good one there but no way was Lesnar knocked out. They fight until someone is knocked out, submits, or time expires. Not until someone gets hit really hard.

This.... If he would have not been defending the fight would have been over.

So Carwin knocked out Lesnar while he was on the ground and continued to pound him and Lesnar kept coming too every few seconds and defending himself then getting knocked out again?

That is impressive.

Lesnar must be the most badass motherf*cker ever.

If that excuse is true then yes he is.

So much stupidity in this thread. My brain hurts.

AT LEAST 70% of the punches Carwin threw while he was trying to ground and pound Brock DID NOT LAND CLEANLY.

Brock was covering his face, kicking Carwin off and making room. He was INTELLIGENTLY defending himself. It's not his fault Carwin can't go past the first round.

What difference does it make that Brock tried to back off (run away)? Who the f*ck wouldn't?

The ref handled the fight well and made the right decision not to stop it so early, because Brock was never in trouble on the ground. Ever.

I approve this message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Newbie

House

Posted
Posted

yeah he looks like such a badass running away.

So what if he "ran away"? You get punched in the face by Carwin and see if your ass doesn't feel the need to immediately get as far away from that poo as possible. Its what you do when you are in a fight with someone and they knock the poo out of you, you try to get some seperation so you can collect yourself. You don't stand there and take another shot to the face.

I guess that is your own little "personal victory" there so you can hold onto that as hard as you need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rodeo Veteran

rodeo

Posted
Posted

you forgot the part where Carwin tapped out

it's really not hard to make someone tap after they they spend 5 minutes beating your ass to unconsciousness long past the point the fight should've been stopped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rodeo Veteran

rodeo

Posted
Posted

It was one of the most anticlimactic matches ever.

haha that's exactly what i said a few minutes after it was over.

the crowd was totally dead for a solid 5 minutes because everyone was leaning over to the person next to them saying 'should've been stopped in the first round.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dpantherman Newbie

Dpantherman

Posted
Posted

mma fans.

why? its over. just like bad calls that can't be fixed. only its a divide. because everyone doesn't think its a bad call. my whole point is nothing anyone can say will change it. hate it all day long, but its over with. im fan, but the results won't change so what's the point. theres still going to be a UFC 117. the world of MMA isn't stopping after this fight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rodeo Veteran

rodeo

Posted
Posted

because i like discussing mma. what the hell are you talking about?

you can't change results of any panthers games, why on earth would you be on a forum to discuss them?

that was certainly the stupidest post of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jasonluckydog
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By jasonluckydog · Posted

      Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • TD alt
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By TD alt · Posted

      In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...