Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just got my first handgun permits...


Samuel L. Jackson

Recommended Posts

Guest CatofWar

I mean with the price of ammo the way it is, why not just buy something in 9mm and use it for self defense and to go plink? Figure out which caliber for what purpose you want, then go from there. Go to the shop, fondle everything, rent some guns, get some trigger time, see what's best. Don't go by recommendations made on a message board. Every asshole and their mom will say get a glock (including me), but a glock might not be for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a first gun I would go with a 9mm Beretta or Glock. You cant go wrong with those two guns and they both shoot very smooth. Besides you will almost pay just as much for 22s as you will for 9mm. Once you get a fill for those go out and get you a .45ACP. There is nothing better for home protection in a handgun.

That would be my choice nice shot grouping and hardly any kick. Looks nice too.

IMG_0148.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be my choice nice shot grouping and hardly any kick. Looks nice too.

IMG_0148.JPG

Yea I love the feel of a 1911 in my hand. There expensive but great guns. The Glock is not bad though and you can double tap them so you can send 2 bullets in less then a few seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...