Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Meet R.J. Stanford, Part I


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

BS: Nickel coverage fits his game at the moment while he continues to learn the cornerback position and develop himself technically. He has the ability to be a cover corner down the line, but if you put him up against a guy like Larry Fitzgerald right now, he's going to be overmatched. He's just not ready to handle an above-average receiver at the moment. Until he has more experience in practice going up against NFL receivers, anything other than nickel coverage is not a good idea

Brian Swinney: R.J. has 4.3 speed and it is legit 4.3 speed. That alone should get him a roster spot. Despite not starting full time until his senior year, he did play in all but one game (52 out of 53) in his career at Utah. He saw the field a lot, so he's plenty seasoned.

http://car.scout.com/2/985194.html

Part 2

http://car.scout.com/2/985453.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Totally.  I'm less comparing them as players and using him as a reference point.  I legitimately think Bryce is capable of being a better NFL QB than Kyler has been.  Kyler has no clutch gene and doesn't seem to have a grip on the locker room, or much love for the game.  Much different body types/strengths and weaknesses.   Crazy to think-- but Kyler is at year 7 as a 1.01...38-48-1 on his career, 0-1 in the playoffs. He's somehow played well enough to keep it going but crazy to think he's barely even touched the playoffs.  Hasn't done anything that special for the Cards.  That's what you don't want to be stuck in.  Cardinals are in softball purgatory with him.    
    • It's not analysis. There was no attempt to analyze anything or even convey new information at all.
    • As to the topic, I've complained before about "superstar" mentality, i.e. the notion that you can win championships with one superstar player surrounded by a group of mediocre fill ins. It just doesn't work. The Manning-Brady rivalry was something of a showcase for that. The Colts general approach focused everything on Manning. The Patriots? Oh, they also had a superstar quarterback but they built a complete team, especially on the defensive side. This sort of thing is why I've argued many times that "system quarterback" should be to considered a description, not an insult. I know everybody loves the "MVP" athletic types, and they're fun to watch, but that's not necessarily the true path to consistent winning and championship glory.
×
×
  • Create New...