Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Updates from the team today.


carpanfan96
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Stanky gonna be that dude for us.  Could easily see him being a core piece. 

He’s going to be given the chance to be a top 3 forward and a top line PP player here in Carolina for the rest of the season. Still under term for this year and next, then rfa for 2026 based on data from puck and sporttrac. 
 

so he’s definitely got a chance. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top 10 goalie 

3-4 guys who are scoring on pace with the average teams best scorer, save for a few studs.

Team positioned safely in the playoffs as long as they don't blow key games this month.

 

Absolute meltdown by people for some reason.

I get not enjoying getting to the dance and then failing to go to a cup every year for the last 6 years....but we've made the conference finals twice in the last 6 years. 33% of the time since 2019, we're a top 4 NHL team. 

 

Again, perspective. This team reminds me a lot of 2019. It's all about putting it together and scoring consistently. If they can do it, they're gonna be really dangerous. Especially given our goaltending being typically strong.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, lightsout said:

Top 10 goalie 

3-4 guys who are scoring on pace with the average teams best scorer, save for a few studs.

Team positioned safely in the playoffs as long as they don't blow key games this month.

 

Absolute meltdown by people for some reason.

I get not enjoying getting to the dance and then failing to go to a cup every year for the last 6 years....but we've made the conference finals twice in the last 6 years. 33% of the time since 2019, we're a top 4 NHL team. 

 

Again, perspective. This team reminds me a lot of 2019. It's all about putting it together and scoring consistently. If they can do it, they're gonna be really dangerous. Especially given our goaltending being typically strong.

And won a combined 0 games in said finals....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

And won a combined 0 games in said finals....

To a hot Bruins team who lost in the SCF to an even better Blues team and then to the team that ran into the Vegas buzzsaw. Call it moral victories but poo, we weren't drummed out by bums.

 

Reaching the playoffs is tough. Doing it 6 straight years is tougher. Winning once there, again, hard. At the end of the day, we're frustrated at having a real good team that isn't putting it together in the playoffs lol

 

 

Edited by lightsout
Mixed up my seasons
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, lightsout said:

To a hot Bruins team who lost in the SCF to an even better Blues team and then to the team that ran into the Vegas buzzsaw. Call it moral victories but poo, we weren't drummed out by bums.

 

Reaching the playoffs is tough. Doing it 6 straight years is tougher. Winning once there, again, hard. At the end of the day, we're frustrated at having a real good team that isn't putting it together in the playoffs lol

 

 

Rods system has its limits and until proven otherwise that is winning a game past the ECF....

 

0-8 is HUMILIATING no matter how you scratch it.

And then there was last year and losing three in a row to start the series vs the rags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

He found it today 

Yes he did although not a skill goal was nice to see.

Both the new guys seem to know to crash the net, that will do well in rods just throw everything on net scheme. 

 

No matter what happens this year I'm just not sure we have the skill to be a true contender. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, PantherChris said:

Yes he did although not a skill goal was nice to see.

Both the new guys seem to know to crash the net, that will do well in rods just throw everything on net scheme. 

 

No matter what happens this year I'm just not sure we have the skill to be a true contender. 

 

I don't mean this rudely, and I'm sincere in saying that but text often comes off more blunt than I intend.

 

Your criticism of the goal not being a "skill goal", which leads me to believe you use this subjective eye test of goals to differentiate dirty goals from skill goals as a barometer of actual skill or talent, shows that you have a very odd view of hockey.

 

Hockey is a basic fuging sport. Put puck in net without interfering with goalie's body and without raising stick higher than crossbar. How it gets done absolutely does not matter.

People see prime Sid and Ovie and McJesus and think "that's what a great player is". No, that's what absurd talent is. That is generational talent we may not see again for years after they're gone. 

The Canes have been very inconsistent of late since January (10-5 that month). A really bad February (2-5) and so far, a good March (4-1).

We don't know what team we're taking into April. The Tampa game will tell us a bit more where we are right now.

 

Rod's system falls apart when teams do a good job of FORCING us into crashing the net. We don't do well with creating shooting lanes and when we do get them, we miss more than any of us would like. I think it's a mentality thing at the end of the day where we have an issue with shrinking when we fail at the good chances too many times. Crashing the net is, was and forever will be a viable scoring method. It's arguably the way most goals are scored. Getting rebounds and firing at open nets is far easier than sniping goalies glove or five hole. But true enough that open shot lanes are needed to be had and capitalized on so we're not hoping for bounces to go our way.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...