Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Armanti and the Wildcat


Razeyfingers

Recommended Posts

I keep hearing this mentioned every so often and I just was curious to know how many of you think that this will actually be in our playbook this year (for Armanti specifically). Although I do think its likely we may have at least a wildcat formation in the playbooks, I just dont see AE running it just yet. I think the coaches are going to back off that and let him learn how to play receiver for now, at least a year I would think. Let him study and watch a little. Once he has a decent handle on "ballin like 89" then hook him up with that wildcat and see what happens.

Man, on a side note its incredible that because of his potential I am already feeling impatient for AE to become a star. I think I was impatient actually the day we drafted him. WTF Armanti catch for 200, run for 200, and throw for 200 at the draft already!!! WHAT'S TAKING SO LONG?!?!?!

Gonna be a great year, fellas, FUGGIN GREAT YEAR! . . . no matter what

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the next question is who would run the wildcat for us? If not Armanti for now, do we even have any business considering that formation?

Well, we saw Williams run it a few times last year without success. Teams knew that he was really only a threat to run out of that formation.

I think I'd rather see Edwards used in some screens and reverses before a Wildcat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'll do myself a lot of good by just hoping that he does well on ST's this year while he adapts to the new position. I remember someone saying that he had a minor fumbling issue at App, but nothing serious. I also remember someone else saying that was bullshiznacky so Idk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'll do myself a lot of good by just hoping that he does well on ST's this year while he adapts to the new position. I remember someone saying that he had a minor fumbling issue at App, but nothing serious. I also remember someone else saying that was bullshiznacky so Idk.

Not to be a Debbie Downer, but I don't think he'll contribute much to special teams, either. He just doesn't have much experience at all as a returner. I'd be thrilled if he could pick it up quickly, but right now I'm thinking someone like Witherspoon will be our punt returner. I'd like to see Goodson in that role if he could hold on to the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it keeps the defense honest

we arent the saints or the colts, so we could put ae and dw under center once or twice to throw them off

Yep because it forces the other team to put a package on the field that can beat it. If they dont have that package then we would go back to it again and again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...