Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cantwell on the block?


MHS831

Recommended Posts

It seemed a bit odd that they pulled Pike to allow Cantwell to run the 2 minute drill at the end of the game Thursday. I have since developed a theory (I say stuff like that to get the dickheads involved). Points:

a. the Panthers have been singing Cantwell's praises since OTAs, after they drafted Pike. Have they been promoting him?

b. Allowing him to showcase his arm after Clausen showed he is the backup by playing well. A solid, game-winning drive would have boosted his stock. If you were going to pull Pike, why not give the experience to Clausen? Because Cantwell is on the block and needs exposure.

c. The Panthers know that Cincinnati has a buzzard on the line waiting for them to cut Pike; he will never make the PS. The Panthers like Pike, but the quarter system at Cincinnati threw him way behind. They know nobody is going to give up squat for him until they force the Panthers' hand and wait to see what they do with 4 QBs--somebody has to go. But by keeping Pike as the #3 and TRADING Cantwell, you do Cantwell a favor, Pike a favor, and the Panthers get something in return.

d. QBs are rather scarce in the NFL right now, and Cantwell would fit nicely in a system where he could challenge for the backup job, a place like Cincy, Indy, Pittsburgh, etc. The possiblity of getting a young backup is worth a solid, rotational DT or a LB.

e. Even if Moore leaves in 2011, Clausen and Pike should be ready for new roles. Add a veteran QB or work Edwards in as the emergency third stringer, and they seem solid at QB, if only on paper, for 2011.

IR for Pike is the other option, and The Bungles have to know that. However, you aren't doing Pike any favors when he needs so much work. If we could trade Cantwell and pick up value like we did with Chris Harris, Leonard Louis, Tank Tyler, etc, it could help.

BTW--THis LB we got from Oklahoma via BUffalo was a tweener who didn't fit. He will be much better here.

Possible? yep. Probable? Nope. Discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you seen the depth at QB around the league? David Carr is still playing. QUinn is drowning in Denver. Brunell is still a backup. Cantwell has more value than you realize. Besides, if you are going to cut someone loose, get something for him. I think they would rather have Pike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm-they like Pike and he is behind (as I mentioned). If they were sold on Cantwell and wanted to develop him as a backup, why draft a 4th QB? You are assuming that Moore isn't re-signed and that 3 minutes in a rainy exhibition game is all they need to abandon Pike. Open the mind a bit. Nobody said it was probable, but if you are going to discount it entirely, use sound logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. We are talking about a QB with a strong arm who is young. No NFL team would be interested in that. Are you guys watching the other exhibition games? Cantwell is rough, but he is better than some of the second teamers I have seen. Yes,NFL teams cut players. I read that this morning somewhere. But QBs are in demand, and coaches love his tools. Is he ready to be a backup? No. But his upside is higher than many who will make teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pike was the best player on the board when he was drafted and if he is able to be held either on the roster or PS then he's a project just like Cantwell is. However, I have no clue as to why they pulled him after three snaps in the last preseason game so you theory does hold up mostly because of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade Moore? They will either let him walk without negotiating a contract and usher in the Clausen era or they will sign him to a long-term, multi-million dollar deal. They will not be able to trade him, unless they franchise him. After the Peppers experience and knowing Clausen is in the garage, I don't see us matching Manning/Brady money to keep him here, nor do I see another team willing to pay his salary if we tried to trade him. We will have to commit to him, or let him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pike was the best player on the board when he was drafted and if he is able to be held either on the roster or PS then he's a project just like Cantwell is. However, I have no clue as to why they pulled him after three snaps in the last preseason game so you theory does hold up mostly because of that.

They did because of the opposite of this thread. It is Pike on the block and not Cantwell.

First of all, some of the locals have gotten to some of you because no one wants Cantwell. Only in Carolina are you reading posts that he is the next Tom Brady. It was a joke to begin with especially after drafting not one not two but THREE quarterbacks in the 2010 draft.

BUT, I think Cantwell has done a commendable job and is certainly way ahead of Pike in all facets of the game. I think they held Pike out because honestly they didn't want him to screw anything up and hurt his trade stock. He probably never ran the 2 min drill live in practice and would have looked terrible. The smart thing to do was put Cantwell back in and they did. Don't read into it too much in that regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. He is better than Vick. I think he is better than any QB not named Manning in Indy and any QB not named Rothelsbuergerrrer in Pittsburgh. Then there are a dozen places where he could challenge for the backup job. Last year, we had McCown as our backup. I think he is in the arena league now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...