Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game 10 Clausen Becomes Starter


fitty76

Recommended Posts

Especially pre-season games for poo sake. "Oh Moore threw a pick! Start Clausen!" What did you see out of Clausen this game anyway that showed you he was a better option than Moore??

I agree and Im a Clausen fan. I think Clausen is the future but there is absolutely no reason to rush him. An NFL game is faster than what you are seeing now. Moore and Clausen arent notorious INT throwers so Im not worried about the INTs but the line has to get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Especially pre-season games for poo sake. "Oh Moore threw a pick! Start Clausen!" What did you see out of Clausen this game anyway that showed you he was a better option than Moore??

Preseason not important huh? Why play it? What did I see. For starters- Did better under pressure which says a lot when your playing with the worst OL Ive seen in years! No receivers that could get open and a terrible center who was snapping the ball to Satan! Still put together a drive to put points on the board> This guy is the real deal whether you get it now or when that bandwagon is officially sanctioned. I for one want a QB that gives us the best chance and I don't feel as if Moore is that guy. Clausen needs some reps with the first string Just to let a play develop and get more deep balls under his belt!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Jimmy Clausen took over in the second half he didn’t have any more success than Matt Moore. He played the entire second half, completing just 9 of 22 passes for 72 yards and, with a chance to lead the Panthers to a winning touchdown, threw an interceptions with 1:35 left in the game. He was sacked three times. Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree and Im a Clausen fan. I think Clausen is the future but there is absolutely no reason to rush him. An NFL game is faster than what you are seeing now. Moore and Clausen arent notorious INT throwers so Im not worried about the INTs but the line has to get better.

Exactly. I'm not a Clausen hater at all; I do think he's our future. But Matt Moore has shown he can start in this league, and he's our best option at this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Jimmy Clausen took over in the second half he didn’t have any more success than Matt Moore. He played the entire second half, completing just 9 of 22 passes for 72 yards and, with a chance to lead the Panthers to a winning touchdown, threw an interceptions with 1:35 left in the game. He was sacked three times. Just saying.

That's a great point because it proves mine. More pressure and he still was able to put a scoring drive together!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There should be 2 pre-season games. That's it.

Maybe 2.

Maybe even 0.

Pre-season is worthless.

Our starters haven't even played 4 whole quarters of football yet poo is hitting the fan.

This is part of the reason pre-season is a joke.

Preseason is worthless?? Your fn crazy and or have no real love or understanding of how football works...Saying that preseason is worthless comes more from a marketing point of view when you realize that money isn't being generated because the lack of attention people with ADD have! Its like saying boxing isn't worth watching unless it's pay-per-view

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he still was able to put a scoring drive together!!

Scoring drive? He didn't score.

Also, he wasn't exactly playing against 1st string, plus the Jets aren't playing with their top CB (who wouldn't be on the field at that point anyway).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scoring drive? He didn't score.

Also, he wasn't exactly playing against 1st string, plus the Jets aren't playing with their top CB (who wouldn't be on the field at that point anyway).

Dude seriously? Headache time- Uh did he not push the ball into field goal range? Or did He Kick the Field goal from where the drive started? All you people can say is he wasn't playing against first string. Might as well have been, did you not see all that pressure from that amazing 2nd string defense?

U guys crack me up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude seriously? Headache time- Uh did he not push the ball into field goal range? Or did He Kick the Field goal from where the drive started? All you people can say is he wasn't playing against first string. Might as well have been, did you not see all that pressure from that amazing 2nd string defense?

U guys crack me up

Just because the O-line sucked does not mean that the other team was any better.

Field goal range means nothing if you don't actually get a field goal (4th quarter drive).

If you are referencing the 7 yard, 1:21 drive where the Panthers got their only points, I wouldn't call that very successful.

EDIT:

didn't realize moving 7 yards was consider a scoring drive

Beat me to the punch... again... :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
    • 100% agree, trading him would be the best possible scenario. It allows for a clean start at QB and you get something back.
×
×
  • Create New...