Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Need help With My Receiver Situation.


Recommended Posts

My team is really shallow on the wide receiver side of things, but I have a lot of different options in my league that could be potential sleepers. I can't decide who to drop or who to pick up, so I thought I'd turn to you guys for some advice.

On my team, I have…

Hines Ward (Definitely keeping)

Jeremy Maclin (Keeping)

Devin Hester (Keeping)

Arrelious Benn (Probably dropping)

Brandon Stokely (Probably dropping)

Nate Washington (Plan on keeping)

I'm gonna go ahead and list some of my league's options.

Jerheme Urban (KC)

Chansi Stuckey (CLE)

**Early Doucet (ARI)**

Sam Aiken (NE)

Brian Gibson (STL)

**Bobby Wade (WSH)**

Greg Camarillo (MIA)

Bryant Johnson (DET)

**Sammie Straughter (TB)**

Matt Jones (CIN)

Antwan Randle El (PITT)

Michael Clayton (TB)

Brandon Lloyd (DEN)

**Danny Amendola (STL)**

**Brian Robiskie (CLE)**

The five starred ones are the ones who I have put the most thought into. Any of those guys look better than what I have right now??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Floyd won't be on most people's waiver wires...

Naanee might.

Doucet is interesting with the QB change...Robiskie might be as well considering they may have to use Cribbs more in a RB role due to Hardesty's injury. Laurent Robinson is another one that should be looked at due to the fact Avery's done for a while/if not for the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless this is the huddle league that Future set up I would pick up Mike Williams former USC WR now in Seattle. He beat out T.J. Whosyourmama for the starting flanker job. He should get plenty of looks in the redzone if Pete Carroll's history is anything to go buy. Carroll LOVES huge physical WR's down in the redzone, see Mike Williams, Dwayne Jarrett, Patrick Turner and Damian Williams......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Mike Williams out of SEA is definitely worth a flier. Potential sleeper of epic proportions (Ok maybe not epic, but pretty good).zKeep an eye on Deon Butler and Golden Tate, also.

As far as your list goes, the only one that I would actually consider is Camarillo. It's not like Berrian is a beast, Harvin has headaches, and Rice is out for half the season. Camarillo has never dropped a ball thrown his way. He and Favre should be able to establish a rapport for that reason alone.

I would also keep an eye on Jordan Shipley in Cincy. and Mark Clayton in St. Louis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just picked up Camarillo after reading about him (mind you, I still have Mike Williams). I figured that I had better get Camarillo before tomorrow night's game. If he sucks, then I'll just drop him. Low risk. I had to drop Jairus Byrd, but hopefully he'll still be on waivers when I want him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...