Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the owners: JR #3


Murph

Recommended Posts

Jerry Richardson - A year ago, just before I unveiled these rankings, Richardson rocked my world by firing his sons, a clear sign of two things: He’s firmly back in the saddle after a heart transplant that saved his life, and he takes his role as the managing partner of an ownership group very, very seriously. At the NFL owner meetings in Orlando last March Richardson, the management council’s point man on the labor front, made an even more emphatic statement, opening a session on the first day with a fiery speech that had some of his peers ready to run through a wall. Recalls one witness, “Jerry said, ‘We signed a [expletive] deal last time, and we’re going to stick together and take back our league and [expletive] do something about it.’ He was practically yelling. It was amazing, and it set an incredible tone.” It helped that Richardson had as much credibility as anybody in the room. He’s a former player who has thrived in a small-market setting without whining about its challenges and has consistently stuck up for the interests and concerns of others. He’s also one of commissioner Roger Goodell’s closest allies and is the emblem of integrity and professionalism. For what it’s worth I think Richardson likely had a potential lockout in mind when he resisted the temptation to fire coach John Fox after last season and throw tons of money at former Steelers coach Bill Cowher, who lives in North Carolina. With Fox’s contract set to expire after the current campaign, this thing could go a lot of different ways, but I have little doubt that after the labor war ends and a new CBA is forged, Richardson will continue to push aggressively for a championship. And for what it’s worth Danny Morrison, the former TCU athletic director who Richardson hired as team president after relieving his son Mark of those duties, has gotten positive reviews in league circles.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=Ao0.pVpIB2d30VzoKmh3CzlDubYF?slug=ms-ownerrankingsparttwo090310

That little opening speech to the owners is something else. Anyone still think that our current revised, young team is here strictly for talent reasons and not for CBA reasons? Anyone still think JR might trade for or sign a WR with a (or demanding a) large multi-year deal? Think again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=Ao0.pVpIB2d30VzoKmh3CzlDubYF?slug=ms-ownerrankingsparttwo090310

That little opening speech to the owners is something else. Anyone still think that our current revised, young team is here strictly for talent reasons and not for CBA reasons? Anyone still think JR might trade for or sign a WR with a (or demanding a) large multi-year deal? Think again.

Sorry Murph but that reports makes me love JR even more.

Did he make moves this season with the labor issue in mind, yes. But not for a lack of a bigger picture. In his mind, right or wrong, a new and better CBA will allow his team to better compete and win championships.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Murph but that reports makes me love JR even more.

Did he make moves this season with the labor issue in mind, yes. But not for a lack of a bigger picture. In his mind, right or wrong, a new and better CBA will allow his team to better compete and win championships.

Dittos to mountainpantherfan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHat does he mean take the league back? The 60/40 payscale not fair? The fact that hardly any of the teams will disclose their earnings?

1) He means that the owners gave in to a deal in the last CBA to keep football going but it was a bad deal and thus the reason for the escape clause they used that created this issue in the first place. That CBA would have never been approved or supported if they knew that the economy was going to tank the way it did but were smart enough to place a clause in the CBA that would allow them to get out of it in case it did.

2) No, the 60/40 scale is not fair as compared to every other company in the world and compared to every business model there is out there. A business is considered to be in good financial standing if they can keep their personel salaries under 52%. That number is generally suggested for non-profits as it allows a business to tread water. In order to be considered a successfully financial company personel salaries should be around 40%. But lets not forget that the players are not the only "personel" on staff for the NFL. There is the league office, officials, coaches, assistants, scouts, trainers, stadium employees and front office staff including the GM. Why did so many front office employees lose there jobs across the NFL over the last two years? Because the players had to be paid...

3) The Carolina Panthers nor any other team is a publicly traded company and thus do not have to disclose any of their financial records. They do however give a gereral report, which is more than they have to do. I'm sorry but how many companys to you know of that disclose their financials to the public or for that matter even the employees. Non-profit or publicly traded company, yes. But that is not what the Panthers are. In my opinion, team owners have been more than generous in allowing the NFLPA to see the amount they have. How would the players feel if the owners asked that every player disclose publicly their finances?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's your right to refer to it as vague, but it still flouts the theory of "zero evidence" that Tepper is changing. Here's another: "Carolina Panthers head coach Dave Canales and general manager Dan Morgan are reportedly being given a larger leadership role within the organization. Panthers owner David Tepper 'has taken a more hands-off approach of late,' according to ESPN's Jeremy Fowler. 'He's trying to trust Canales and GM Dan Morgan to get it right, knowing that the roster requires patience in its current state,' Fowler wrote. 'We shall see if he holds to that.'" https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10146782-report-panthers-david-tepper-has-taken-a-more-hands-off-approach-to-team   ""David Tepper just wants to win and he's gonna supply everything that we need to win.. Things are changing around here and things are looking really positive" ~ Dan Morgan  https://x.com/PatMcAfeeShow/status/1917639137550627107?t=6vgo8yXTO6eD0Gb55hyzNg&s=19   From about 2:15-6:35, Julian Council, Locked on Panthers, gives his take on whether Tepper seems to be changing (and specifically referenced the war room in his analysis):    Dean Jones of Cat Crave on David Tepper in the war room. "He was an innocent bystander throughout a hugely important decision, placing full trust in Morgan and Tilis to make the right call." Jones also quoted Pat McAfee: "What I noticed though, at one point, they looked at (David) Tepper to get an answer, Tepper didn’t say sh*t. All anybody has said about Tepper is that he’s hands-on, hands-on, hands-on. Too handsy, too involved. He’s not letting the football people do their thing. We just watched in the biggest moment for their franchise, a top ten pick, he just sat there and let everybody do their jobs. I think if you’re a Panthers fan, you love everything you saw there." https://catcrave.com/silence-from-david-tepper-becomes-panthers-loudest-victory Granted, you're not getting a major headline here, but that's not going to happen anyway. Fowler isn't exactly a nobody, everybody knows McAfee, and you also have some locals that follow the team (including Dean Jones). Of course you have a right to believe that Tepper hasn't really changed, but to say there is no evidence that he just may be changing is not really true. It's just not. Hate the guy, but the way that he has handled this current regime is different than he handled previous teams, and his silence in the war room and publicly in general is different than years back.
    • Ehhh im not mad either way I don't think hes garbage but he was and is overpaid.... but he was a skating turnover machine.
    • My interpretation of his comments was somewhat different. And I took issue with his contract the day he signed. But it's all history now and doesn't matter in the big picture.
×
×
  • Create New...