Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bold prediction for the offseason. Panthers will tag Peppers, ....and trade him.


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

This has nothing to do with my opinions of anybody's play or anybody's feelings or suspicions. Pep is one of my favorite players on the team. But it makes perfect sense.

Peppers would've accepted that big contract already if his mind was made up that he wanted to stay. In order to prevent him from entering the free agent market, the Panthers will put the franchise tag on him, and Peppers will comply, unlike a lot of other players, who've hated being tagged in the past. The Panthers and Peppers will posture to other teams that they are in good spirits, ...which they are, so that ultimately, every other team knows the only way they can get him now is to trade for him. This ensures that, even in his departure, Peppers wants to help the team out, and if he can help it by letting other teams give up draft picks, then that's good. Worst case scenario is that he'll still be on the 2009 squad with a hefty salary.

Trade partners you ask? Well, for one, Dan Snyder's Redskins are always in the running, they'll trade for anyone or anything. Washington would gladly offer up a first rounder, and maybe a third rounder, to boot. (Wash doesn't have a second rounder but if they didn't, you could assume they would offer that up instead of a third.)

Kansas City sorely missed Jared Allen's presence in the defense, and if they are high enough on Peppers, they could offer their top 5 first rounder, which they could use on a DE like Brian Orakpo, or, trade down to accumulate a plethora of picks to accommodate various skill positions there are lingering question marks about, such as:

DT: There needs to be a line disruptor to complement our run stuffer, someone needs to fill the void Jenkins left behind playwise.

QB: Yea I know i'm f*cking reaching here.

SLB: Diggs is 31 and will be getting older. Landon Johnson was supposed to offer a future at this position but he never panned out. An OLB like Brian Cushing in the second round might not be out of the question.

RG: This RG position has been a revolving door every year, and has contributed to the inconsistency of the line. It's not a glaring need, since we have Keydrick as a starter, but he's a little older and it would provide at least more depth before we'd have to put Jeremy Bridges in, and he is absolutely awful at Guard. Duke Robinson would offer a formidable five man line of Gross/Wharton/Kalil/Robinson/Otah, assuming Gross gets re-signed.

TE: Another reach here, this one gets mentioned every year but f*cking eh if they'd ever invest more than a late-round draft pick in it. The Panthers offense might benefit from a total package TE that can run block and get open and pass catch, drawing attention off of Smitty in the process. If first rounder is what they would look at (which they won't) then for example Brandon Pettigrew is your guy in the middle of the round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't see anything bold about that prediction, you are 50th person to say that this week. Same with your predictions about positions of need. Might also add a shutdown corner which we obviously don't have.

Nnamdi himself would not have more than 2 interceptions on this defense. His talent would be wasted, just like Lucas' and Gamble's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm usually 100% in agreement with most of your posts, RB, but in this case, I disagree... I don't know if it's that I really disagree or that I hope your wrong, but I do think the underlying issues are different...

Peppers had the offer, we know that because of Hurney and Pep's agent..

It was put into "off the table" status so to speak...

I believe the reasons for that were basically based on Pep's personality... Pep is not a fan of the media, nor attention... I believe he felt his deal would be the news, and that the team wouldn't be the focus... It would have brought unwanted attention, even if it wasn't negative attention...

If you will recall the rumors of Peppers being traded last offseason, both Hurney and Pep's agent were very very emphatic that they were just rumors, and that Pep wasn't going anywhere.

Did anything he do this season change that? I don't think so at all.

Pep wants to be on a winning team, and hell, we sure were that... Pep wants to be a contender, and Fox has had us in that shape numerous times...

What Pep doesn't want, is to be somewhere where they aren't TRYING to get better. I believe Pep, like a lot of players (Hoov comes to mind as well) feel that our philosophy of not adapting is killing us.

Sure, we could get a lot out of Pep via tag and trade, but I honestly believe that nobody in the Panthers organization, including Peppers, want that...

If we make an honest effort to include the feelings of the players, players whom have been called out for not being "leaders", then that would be a great step in the right direction for everyone.

So props if you prognosticate this correctly, but I and a lot of people hope this won't be a reality...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nnamdi himself would not have more than 2 interceptions on this defense. His talent would be wasted, just like Lucas' and Gamble's.

I wonder if we went away from bump and run because Fox doesn't think our corners can do it or he would actually play the same crappy coverage if he had Nnamdi and Champ Bailey back there. You are probably right though.

Hard to know what the hecks he thinks, or if he is thinking at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bold prediction: in the offseason, we will see more threads like this

At least we have something to talk about, until(or if) it happens.

At this point it really does look like that is the best option for the Panthers and Peppers.

Assuming we do trade him, we may very well hit good on some of the picks.

I'm pretty sure we will go almost all defense in this draft.

I wonder if we got somewhere around the 14th or so pick and Crabtree was to fall to us if we would pick him up.(that would be bold :D)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm usually 100% in agreement with most of your posts, RB, but in this case, I disagree... I don't know if it's that I really disagree or that I hope your wrong, but I do think the underlying issues are different...

Peppers had the offer, we know that because of Hurney and Pep's agent..

It was put into "off the table" status so to speak...

I believe the reasons for that were basically based on Pep's personality... Pep is not a fan of the media, nor attention... I believe he felt his deal would be the news, and that the team wouldn't be the focus... It would have brought unwanted attention, even if it wasn't negative attention...

If you will recall the rumors of Peppers being traded last offseason, both Hurney and Pep's agent were very very emphatic that they were just rumors, and that Pep wasn't going anywhere.

Did anything he do this season change that? I don't think so at all.

Pep wants to be on a winning team, and hell, we sure were that... Pep wants to be a contender, and Fox has had us in that shape numerous times...

What Pep doesn't want, is to be somewhere where they aren't TRYING to get better. I believe Pep, like a lot of players (Hoov comes to mind as well) feel that our philosophy of not adapting is killing us.

Sure, we could get a lot out of Pep via tag and trade, but I honestly believe that nobody in the Panthers organization, including Peppers, want that...

If we make an honest effort to include the feelings of the players, players whom have been called out for not being "leaders", then that would be a great step in the right direction for everyone.

So props if you prognosticate this correctly, but I and a lot of people hope this won't be a reality...

In a way, neither do I.

Peppers, even if he looks "nonexistent" in a game, is nonetheless gameplanned and accounted for, so that, he'll open the door for other players to produce and make plays, even if he doesn't appear on the stat sheet. Without him, this defense is not even top 20 (in scheme, not in talent).

Interestingly, Peppers is the only player remaining out of that dominating front four that helped us to a superbowl run in 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nnamdi himself would not have more than 2 interceptions on this defense. His talent would be wasted, just like Lucas' and Gamble's.

Keep in mind that teams TOTALLY AVOID throwing Nn's way.

Put him on Fitz sat night and the Huddle is a different world EVEN with Jake.

I say one taker may be Houston. Has some money, mid 1st rd, NC State player with NC ties. From what I hear Pep likes Houston.

Franchise is the ONLY way right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KC is not offering a top 5 pick for a 29 y/o DE who will wont a monster contract

Dont underestimate a team in real need for pass rush. Texas seems like a possible place also though.

This has nothing to do with my opinions of anybody's play or anybody's feelings or suspicions. Pep is one of my favorite players on the team. But it makes perfect sense.

Peppers would've accepted that big contract already if his mind was made up that he wanted to stay. In order to prevent him from entering the free agent market, the Panthers will put the franchise tag on him, and Peppers will comply, unlike a lot of other players, who've hated being tagged in the past. The Panthers and Peppers will posture to other teams that they are in good spirits, ...which they are, so that ultimately, every other team knows the only way they can get him now is to trade for him. This ensures that, even in his departure, Peppers wants to help the team out, and if he can help it by letting other teams give up draft picks, then that's good. Worst case scenario is that he'll still be on the 2009 squad with a hefty salary.

Trade partners you ask? Well, for one, Dan Snyder's Redskins are always in the running, they'll trade for anyone or anything. Washington would gladly offer up a first rounder, and maybe a third rounder, to boot. (Wash doesn't have a second rounder but if they didn't, you could assume they would offer that up instead of a third.)

Kansas City sorely missed Jared Allen's presence in the defense, and if they are high enough on Peppers, they could offer their top 5 first rounder, which they could use on a DE like Brian Orakpo, or, trade down to accumulate a plethora of picks to accommodate various skill positions there are lingering question marks about, such as:

DT: There needs to be a line disruptor to complement our run stuffer, someone needs to fill the void Jenkins left behind playwise.

QB: Yea I know i'm f*cking reaching here.

SLB: Diggs is 31 and will be getting older. Landon Johnson was supposed to offer a future at this position but he never panned out. An OLB like Brian Cushing in the second round might not be out of the question.

RG: This RG position has been a revolving door every year, and has contributed to the inconsistency of the line. It's not a glaring need, since we have Keydrick as a starter, but he's a little older and it would provide at least more depth before we'd have to put Jeremy Bridges in, and he is absolutely awful at Guard. Duke Robinson would offer a formidable five man line of Gross/Wharton/Kalil/Robinson/Otah, assuming Gross gets re-signed.

TE: Another reach here, this one gets mentioned every year but f*cking eh if they'd ever invest more than a late-round draft pick in it. The Panthers offense might benefit from a total package TE that can run block and get open and pass catch, drawing attention off of Smitty in the process. If first rounder is what they would look at (which they won't) then for example Brandon Pettigrew is your guy in the middle of the round.

__________________

Really not a bold prediction. I mean I think 2 reporters have already said this and from what Pep is saying it seems likely. Also IMO its the best thing for us cause it clears up a hell of a lot of cap room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that teams TOTALLY AVOID throwing Nn's way.

Put him on Fitz sat night and the Huddle is a different world EVEN with Jake.

I say one taker may be Houston. Has some money, mid 1st rd, NC State player with NC ties. From what I hear Pep likes Houston.

Franchise is the ONLY way right now.

If we trade Pep we could afford Asmonga(spelling) and a 1st round DE or DT in the draft. Really would make Trgo look good also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...