Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anybody with keen football knowledge


lightsout

Recommended Posts

Particularly the I-formation, I need you. I am majoring in physical education and also getting a teacher's license for English as well. On top of that, I plan on coaching high school football. I spend a lot of time thinking of what I want to run, and I have what I want my base offense to be (similar to Georgia Tech's offense), but I want a complimentary offense for change of pace purposes. I chose the I, as I intend on playing smash mouth football, then taking advantage of defenses who sell out on the run with crisp play action. My problem is, I can't figure out how to make the passing tree I have for the option work for the I.

So, does anybody have any ideas for terminology on passing plays? I am completely drawing a blank.

Also, if this is in the wrong place, sorry. Looked to be the only place I could post it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may need to build your offense around the talent you have. Some towns the elem and middle schools might be organized enough to feed to your system on the high school level but that's tough to do.

If you have superior runners, decent blocking, sure I might be good.

I prefer flex offenses. At times run, times pass.

Bring this offense back because many don't run it and it's a pre cursor to the spread we have now.

The Veer. When you make the State just PM and I will come watch you guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Particularly the I-formation, I need you. I am majoring in physical education and also getting a teacher's license for English as well. On top of that, I plan on coaching high school football. I spend a lot of time thinking of what I want to run, and I have what I want my base offense to be (similar to Georgia Tech's offense), but I want a complimentary offense for change of pace purposes. I chose the I, as I intend on playing smash mouth football, then taking advantage of defenses who sell out on the run with crisp play action. My problem is, I can't figure out how to make the passing tree I have for the option work for the I.

So, does anybody have any ideas for terminology on passing plays? I am completely drawing a blank.

Also, if this is in the wrong place, sorry. Looked to be the only place I could post it.

I'm no coach, but you can find some good boards out there for this type of thing.

http://www.scribd.com/mobile/documents/32425080

3 step routes tend to be hooks and slants to the receivers to offset heavy pressure and press coverage while the TE (or slot) either goes up on a post or out (Boise St toasted VT on a play action with the TE running a post last night).

5 step routes typically have an outside receiver on one side running a post or squaring off on an in route on one side, the interior receiver (a TE or slot) going outside with the flanker going inside in some fashion (or vice versa) or having the flanker on a go route to burn them deep.

A favorite of mine on Madden (for serious!) is to run a play where the inside receiver runs a go while flanker runs a 10-15 yrd dig to take advantage of the safety going deep while the TE drags across taking advantage of the clear out.

I can tell you it will be no mean feat to install the triple option at the HS level, but it obviously can be run out of the I as well as the wishbone and the veer.

Triple option teams have very, very few pass plays due to the sheer complexity of the running plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...