Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anybody with keen football knowledge


lightsout

Recommended Posts

Particularly the I-formation, I need you. I am majoring in physical education and also getting a teacher's license for English as well. On top of that, I plan on coaching high school football. I spend a lot of time thinking of what I want to run, and I have what I want my base offense to be (similar to Georgia Tech's offense), but I want a complimentary offense for change of pace purposes. I chose the I, as I intend on playing smash mouth football, then taking advantage of defenses who sell out on the run with crisp play action. My problem is, I can't figure out how to make the passing tree I have for the option work for the I.

So, does anybody have any ideas for terminology on passing plays? I am completely drawing a blank.

Also, if this is in the wrong place, sorry. Looked to be the only place I could post it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may need to build your offense around the talent you have. Some towns the elem and middle schools might be organized enough to feed to your system on the high school level but that's tough to do.

If you have superior runners, decent blocking, sure I might be good.

I prefer flex offenses. At times run, times pass.

Bring this offense back because many don't run it and it's a pre cursor to the spread we have now.

The Veer. When you make the State just PM and I will come watch you guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Particularly the I-formation, I need you. I am majoring in physical education and also getting a teacher's license for English as well. On top of that, I plan on coaching high school football. I spend a lot of time thinking of what I want to run, and I have what I want my base offense to be (similar to Georgia Tech's offense), but I want a complimentary offense for change of pace purposes. I chose the I, as I intend on playing smash mouth football, then taking advantage of defenses who sell out on the run with crisp play action. My problem is, I can't figure out how to make the passing tree I have for the option work for the I.

So, does anybody have any ideas for terminology on passing plays? I am completely drawing a blank.

Also, if this is in the wrong place, sorry. Looked to be the only place I could post it.

I'm no coach, but you can find some good boards out there for this type of thing.

http://www.scribd.com/mobile/documents/32425080

3 step routes tend to be hooks and slants to the receivers to offset heavy pressure and press coverage while the TE (or slot) either goes up on a post or out (Boise St toasted VT on a play action with the TE running a post last night).

5 step routes typically have an outside receiver on one side running a post or squaring off on an in route on one side, the interior receiver (a TE or slot) going outside with the flanker going inside in some fashion (or vice versa) or having the flanker on a go route to burn them deep.

A favorite of mine on Madden (for serious!) is to run a play where the inside receiver runs a go while flanker runs a 10-15 yrd dig to take advantage of the safety going deep while the TE drags across taking advantage of the clear out.

I can tell you it will be no mean feat to install the triple option at the HS level, but it obviously can be run out of the I as well as the wishbone and the veer.

Triple option teams have very, very few pass plays due to the sheer complexity of the running plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...