Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you think we need to franchise Peppers before trading him?


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

Based on what he's said, I think he's looking for us to engineer a sign-and-trade deal. That would allow us to keep the franchise tag in case things don't go well with Gross.

Is that a possibility?

I hope so. It doesn't appear to be hostile at this point. I expect Julius to handle this with class, as he has since day one. At the end of the day though, his personal wellfare has to be consideration number one. No different than you and I.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure, but the way espn had it worded it seemed as if pep was wanting carolina to release him of his contract now.
If we did that we wouldn't get anything in return. If we franchise him, we can trade him where we want (not where he wants) or keep him here. From his POV, if we don't franchise him he can go where he wants, so it's in his interest to agree to a sign-and-trade if he gets to specify the team. Otherwise we could slap the tag on him and ship him off to the Lions for draft picks.

If he does agree to a sign-and-trade, we lose a little leverage in negotiations with the other team, but keep our tag if we need it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...