Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Theory on why Fox said what he said.


PantherBrew

Recommended Posts

You know, the whole "Too early to name a starter crap".

I know there is a thread about this already, but I am narcissistic and need the attention, or I will die.

Anyways, this is what I am thinking.

I know we all think Fox hates Moore, and I used to think it too.

But the only explanation I can think of for why Fox wouldn't name Jimmy the starter for the whole season is out of respect for Moore. Okay... take a deep breath, I know I have just blown your mind.

Here is the reasoning: If it took at minimum two weeks for John to bench Matt Moore after a whole off season of being 'the guy'. Then he is not going to name Jimmy the starter for the entire season after one relatively good performance. Much like he didn't name Moore the starter last season after one good game.

So what I am saying, John Fox may be retarded, but he is not that retarded. Jimmy will start next week, but he will probably not be named official 'starter', until we win a game.

Okay, go back to your whack off session.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Then he is not going to name Jimmy the starter for the entire season after one relatively good performance. Much like he didn't name Moore the starter last season after one good game."

I'm a little lost here. Are you saying Clausen's first start yesterday was "one relatively good performance?"

Sorry, I'm not onboard with that synopsis of his game yesterday at all. I thought Clausen was terrible yesterday. If we were going to compare Moore and Clausen, which I don't believe is fair to either QB to begin with, their respective performances were all terrible.

Fox won't name a starter this soon because Clausen got crushed on the Panther's final offensive play and it took him 5 minutes to get off the field. He may very well be concussion tested today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Then he is not going to name Jimmy the starter for the entire season after one relatively good performance. Much like he didn't name Moore the starter last season after one good game."

I'm a little lost here. Are you saying Clausen's first start yesterday was "one relatively good performance?"

Sorry, I'm not onboard with that synopsis of his game yesterday at all. I thought Clausen was terrible yesterday.

Key word bud, relatively. Relatively speaking considering he is a rookie QB making his first start in week 3 against one of the better defenses in the league. It was 'relatively' good start and if you expect a lot better than you need to check your expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Key word bud, relatively. Relatively speaking considering he is a rookie QB making his first start in week 3 against one of the better defenses in the league. It was 'relatively' good start and if you expect a lot better than you need to check your expectations.

Key mistake, bud, making comparisons. Clausen is Clausen, the guy named to start the game as QB. He's not Moore, Manning or Mike Vick. He's not any better or worse than Sam Bradford or Charlie Batch. Making comparisons only serves to create an unrealistic expectation level... look what happened to Matt Moore when everyone began comparing him to Jake.

I have no expectations of the 2010 Carolina Panthers- I've been on record with that statement since the draft. There are for too many unknown variables in this team to create any expectations, one of them being the QB.

But I will say I don't care if the guy is a rookie or not, the fact remains he is the starting QB of a team that is simply not very good on the side of the ball he plays and if we were to speak "relatively"- the entire offense is horrible right now and that offense includes rookies and vets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Key mistake, bud, making comparisons. Clausen is Clausen, the guy named to start the game as QB. He's not Moore, Manning or Mike Vick. He's not any better or worse than Sam Bradford or Charlie Batch. Making comparisons only serves to create an unrealistic expectation level... look what happened to Matt Moore when everyone began comparing him to Jake.

I have no expectations of the 2010 Carolina Panthers- I've been on record with that statement since the draft. There are for too many unknown variables in this team to create any expectations, one of them being the QB.

But I will say I don't care if the guy is a rookie or not, the fact remains he is the starting QB of a team that is simply not very good on the side of the ball he plays and if we were to speak "relatively"- the entire offense is horrible right now and that offense includes rookies and vets.

Haha, I am the one making comparisons between Jimmy and other players? and I am the one with unrealistic expectations?

are you fuging with me? cause if you are, props to you :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, I am the one making comparisons between Jimmy and other players? and I am the one with unrealistic expectations?

are you f**king with me? cause if you are, props to you :D

Did you not use the term "relatively?" You stated Clausen had a relatively good performance, which means "compared to or relative to someone or something else," right? I'm simply asking the question here, because that sounds like a comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am comparing 'his first start and performance', not him as a quarterback, to other rookie QB's making their first start.

Yea his performance was terrible compared to Brady or Manning's "Performance" from yesterday. But compared to other rookies first starts and performances in their first starts, it was relatively good, and it was also relatively good compared to what Moore has done this season.

I am not the one with unrealistic expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am comparing 'his first start and performance', not him as a quarterback, to other rookie QB's making their first start.

Yea his performance was terrible compared to Brady or Manning's "Performance" from yesterday. But compared to other rookies first starts and performances in their first starts, it was relatively good, and it was also relatively good compared to what Moore has done this season.

I am not the one with unrealistic expectations.

I wasn't taking exception with what you were saying because I simply was trying to understand what you making the comparison to. Sorry if I offended, it wasn't my intention.

That being said, my opinion is that his performance was lousy without any comparisons because other rookies have/had other teams, players, coaches, etc., know what I mean?

Sam Bradford had a great day compared to Clausen, but I don't think it's necessarily right to compare the two because they have nothing in common except the fact they're both rooks. It's a collective effort as far as I'm concerned and Jimmy Clausen's miserable performance is being held out for public scrutiny because of his position and his name hype.

But his miserable performance is also a result of equally miserable performances by the O-line, rookie WRs, coaching, playcalling, etc.

The lack of experience, the number off rookies, the inability of the coaching staff; ultra-conservative, vanilla, unimaginative playcalling that make up this team are the reasons I have for walking into BOA every Sunday home game with no expectations...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
    • Nothing about the Flyers scare me. They are a mid team that just barely made the playoffs. 
×
×
  • Create New...