Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Clowney, K Moore, or Guy?


ThatSeptemberDay

Recommended Posts

Im thinking Jarrett will finally be released after his second DWI. So the question is who will take his spot. Gantt says he thinks Clowney fits with our offense, and normally he doesnt talk about other Wr's. Easiest to pick would be Moore, but I think I would want Guy over Moore. And I think Clowney would be the best over all three. He is a fast guy and if we got him today he could share time with Edwards on sunday and give our third WR some speed down the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, I wont say your wrong, but he didn't get any where near the amount of chances Jarrett has here. His first year he sat on the practice squad. Second year he hurt his collarbone, played in two games with one catch, then last year he played in 13 games and caught 14 balls, 191 yards long of 53 and a td. no starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, I wont say your wrong, but he didn't get any where near the amount of chances Jarrett has here. His first year he sat on the practice squad. Second year he hurt his collarbone, played in two games with one catch, then last year he played in 13 games and caught 14 balls, 191 yards long of 53 and a td. no starts.

i dont know man maybe thats cause just like jarrett he never showed the coaching staff anything in practice worth playing him for......i watched hard knocks every week and the coaching staff bitched about clowney on a daily bases

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont know man maybe thats cause just like jarrett he never showed the coaching staff anything in practice worth playing him for......i watched hard knocks every week and the coaching staff bitched about clowney on a daily bases

lol well that doesn't work with comparing to Jarrett either. Jarrett looks like an all star WR in practice. Unfortunately thats the only time. There are guys that are good in practice and suck in game, and guys who suck in practice and do good in game. Maybe Clowney is the opposite of Jarrett but never got many chances for how he looked on the practice field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clowney has at least made some plays in NY before being released. He is who I would go with. Does it really matter though with Davidson only calling 7-8 passing plays in some halves? If they were thinking of opening it up a bit then I'd be concerned but it doesn't appear that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clowney is a legit deep threat. His draft stock fell cuz he lost production his senior year to Eddie Royal and Josh Morgan, 2 players making plays elsewhere in the league.

The only knock is, he got cut by the Packers initially (which is where WRs go to gain insane production) then got picked up by the Jets for a couple years and then had trouble getting on the field because of the crowded WR corp they have now(meaning they wanted more from him). and Unlike Moore and Guy.. he's made a couple plays in preseason AND the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeah, I can get a little of that.  But that's not what he is posting in his argument just now though.   He said people wouldn't even concede to the literal ability to do it when pressed on the literal ability.  I have never seen that.  He maintains it exists somewhere.  I mean, using anomaly games to make arguments about players just isn't the way.   There wasn't a defender within 10 yards of our guys on 2 of those 3 throws Sunday.  No one within 5 on the 3rd.   That's not Bryce Young answering questions about his play downfield..  That's Bryce Young taking advantage of coverage busts by a bad D.  Which hey, that's part of the game too.  Recognition and seeing the field.   It can't totally be dismissed.   That's still good play.  You want your QBs to make those plays.  But it's not getting into the long standing critique of BY IMO.   
    • Deserved, I wouldn’t use that word. Asked for? For sure. Am I upset over it? No.  People forget that AT was throwing his helmet in frustration last season over his QB’s ineptitude. The same QB was pretty inept to start this year, no guarantee AT would have helped him in those games any more than he did last year.  Just sayin.  And Dan doing him a solid probably did not go unnoticed by players around the league. I think it increases his rep with potential FAs. It sure can’t hurt it. 
    • You think that was the fault of the guy that was lighting it up or maybe the bums around him? Funnily enough, those bums are still being bums in his absence. Who would have thought!
×
×
  • Create New...