Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The better question: How can anyone justify Clausen over Moore?


PantherFanForLife

Recommended Posts

Ok first I just want to say, I'm ALL FOR CLAUSEN REMAINING THE STARTER for at least a few more games. You cannot judge him from 3 games alone. But I am so sick of so many people not knowing what the heck they are talking about when it comes to Moore, perfectly ok with judging him by the first 2 games of this season, but not the rest of his career here as a starter, and only looking at bullshit career stats that include him coming in for either 3 minutes, or a quarter, or replacing David Carr.....all the while making bullshit excuses for Clausen, especially for some mistakes that clearly go well beyond the whole "rookie" excuse.

________________________________________________________________________________

__________________Passing_____MATT MOORE_(Career Stats as Starter)_____Rushing___ _____

|game|opp |result |cmp |att |yds |cmp%|ypa |lng |td |int |sack |_rat_ |-|att |yds |avg |lng |td |

|_15_|SEA |W 13-10| 19_ | 27 | 208 | 70.4_|7.70| 54 |_0 |_0| 0.0_ |_92.8 |-| 2_ | _5_ | 2.5 | _5 | 0_|

|_16_|DAL |L _20-13| 15_ | 28 | 182 | 53.6_|6.50| 57 |_1 |_1 | 5.0_ |_70.8 |-| 0_ | _0_ | 0.0 | _0 | 0_|

|_17_| TB_|W 31-23| 15_ | 24 | 174 | 62.5_|7.25| 46 |_2 |_1 | 1.0_ |_94.8 |-| 1_ | _0_ | 0.0 | _0 | 0_|

|_13_| TB_|W 16-6_| 14_ | 20 | 161 | 70.0_|8.05| 66 |_0 |_1 | 1.0_ |_73.1 |-| 1_ | -1_ | -1.0| -1 | 0_|

|_14_| NE_|L _20-10| 15_ | 30 | 197 | 50.0_|6.57| 44 |_1 |_0 | 2.0_ |_82.2 |-| 0_ | _0_ | 0.0 | _0 | 0_|

|_15_|MIN |W 26-7_| 21_ | 33 | 299 | 63.6_|9.06| 55 |_3 |_0 | 2.0_ |123.2 |-| 5_ | -2_ | -0.4| _1 | 0_|

|_16_|NYG|W_41-9_| 15_ | 20 | 171 | 75.0_|8.55| 27 |_3 |_0 | 1.0_ |139.8 |-| 4_ | _2_ | 0.5 | _5 | 0_|

|_17_| NO |W 23-10| 14_ | 23 | 162 | 60.9_|7.04| 30 |_1 |_0 | 2.0_ |_96.6 |-| 1_ | -1_ | -1.0| -1 | 0_|

|__1_|NYG|L_ 31-18| 14_ | 33 | 182 | 42.4_|5.52| 27 |_1 |_3 | 4.0_ |_32.6 |-| 2_ | 15_ | 7.5 | _8 | 0_|

|__2_| TB |L_ 20-7_| _6_ | 16 | 125 | 37.5_|7.81| 37 |_1 |_1 | 4.0_ |_60.7 |-| 1_ | _2_ | 2.0 | _2 | 0_|

_________________________________Totals___________________________________________

|_10_|ALL |__ 6-4_ | 148 |254|2115 | 58.3_|8.32| 66 |13 | 7 |2.2avg|_86.7 |-| 17 | 20_ | 1.2 | _8 | 0_|

__________________________________Totals_(Pre - 2010)_______________________________

|__8_|ALL |__ 6-2_ | 128 |205|1808 | 62.4_|8.81| 66 |11 | 3 |1.8avg|_96.7 |-| 14 | _3_ | 0.2 | _8 | 0_|

_____________________________________________________________________________

___________________Passing__ __JIMMY CLAUSEN_(Career Stats as Starter)____Rushing________

|game|opp |result |cmp |att |yds |cmp%|ypa |lng |td |int |sack |_rat_ |-|att |yds |avg |lng |td |

|__3_| CIN |L _20-7 | 16_ | 33 | 188 | 48.5_|5.70| 44 |_0 |_1 | 1.0_ |_53.6 |-| 6_ | 10_ | 1.7 | _5 | 0_|

|__4_|_NO |L _16-14| 11_ | 21 | 146 | 52.4_|6.95| 55 |_1 |_0 | 3.0_ |_90.6 |-| 2_ | 11_ | 5.5 | _6 | 0_|

|__5_| CHI |L _23-6 | _9_ | 22 | _61 | 40.9_|2.77| 16 |_0 |_1 | 5.0_ |_29.7 |-| 2_ | _0_ | 0.0 | _0 | 0_|

_________________________________Totals__________________________________________

|__3_|ALL |__ 0-3_ | _36 |_76|_495 | 47.4_|6.51| 55 |_1 | 2 |3.0avg|_ 58.0 |-| 10 | 21_ | 2.1 | _6 | 0_|

______________________________________________________________________________

_________________Passing_________Totals: Moore vs Clausen_________Rushing______________

|game|opp|result |cmp |att |yds |cmp%|ypa |lng |td |int |sack |_rat_ |-|att |yds |avg |lng |td |

|_10_|ALL_ |__ 6-4_ | 148 |254|2115| 58.3_|8.32| 66 |13 | 7 |2.2avg|_86.7 |-| 17 | 20_| 1.2 | _8 | 0_|

|__3_|ALL_ |__ 0-3_ | _36 |_76|_495| 47.4_|6.51| 55 |_1 | 2 |3.0avg|_58.0 |-| 10 | 21_| 2.1 | _6 | 0_|

So here are the facts.

-Matt has only played a total of 10 games as a starter, 10 complete games, and only 10 games you can really judge him by.

-In those 10 games he:

1. Went 6-4(including the 2 losses from this year, else he is 6-2!).

2. Had a 3 game winning streak.

3. Has had back to back games throwing 3 touchdowns and no pics with a QB rating of over 120.

4. He threw 13 touchdowns and 7 pics. More than half his pics came from the 2 games this year.

5. He had a 4 game streak of throwing 0 pics.

8. His second game as a rookie in 07 was tough and much like Jimmy Sunday got little help from the O-line. He was sacked 5 times. But he still put up a better completion %, better rating, and scored a touchdown.

9. He has consistently completed over 50% of his passes and thrown for 300 yards before.

10. The two worst games of his career as a starter were the 2 games he played this year.

If you actually look at Moore stats overall as a starter, he's actually pretty freaking decent. He's no Manning, but he's a winner. If you give him the benefit of the doubt of just having 2 bad opening games with this circus of a team, then it gets even better when you take them out of the equation. But I know....no one ever considers Matt could have had a couple of bad games. Everyone is perfectly fine with judging him by the 2 worst games of his career as a starter.

Whatever.

If Clausen stinks it up for the next 3-4 games, no reason Matt should not get a chance to try and finish HIS season. Jimmy would then go back on the bench and earn the job by proving over and over in practice he is the better man, like he should have in the first place. If he really is that good, then he should have nothing to worry about.

Having said that, please STFU with this talk about how attrocious Matt is. Again I am all for consistency and believe Jimmy should stay as a starter. But honestly, tell me again why Matt shouldn't come back looking at his record if Clausen doesn't improve? What's there to justify in that one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares about Moore's wins in previous years? You have to compare the QBs with the team THIS YEAR and Moore came in for less than a quarter and threw 2 picks. THAT is why he is no longer playing...because he is essentially Jake Delhomme Lite.

You cannot bench Clausen (a rookie) after losing his first 3 games when:

A) He really only had one bad game (Bears)

B) That bad game was more a product of his lack of protection and lack of WRs than anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares about Moore's wins in previous years? You have to compare the QBs with the team THIS YEAR and Moore came in for less than a quarter and threw 2 picks. THAT is why he is no longer playing...because he is essentially Jake Delhomme Lite.

You cannot bench Clausen (a rookie) after losing his first 3 games when:

A) He really only had one bad game (Bears)

B) That bad game was more a product of his lack of protection and lack of WRs than anything else.

You are an idiot. Yes who cares about the previous 8 FULL games he played with the franchise, let's care about the last 3 meaningless minutes in Sunday's game.

Yeah, that's how you evaluate a QB.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not compare their college records as well?

Moore is in his fourth year, and this year was the first in which he didn't start the season buried on the depth chart. And this year we finally saw what the coaches were afraid of and why he had been buried on the depth chart.

Old games are old news. Moore did well when he had a defense that surrendered less than 10 points a game and a running game that churned out 150 yards on the ground. Take those away and he looks unprepared and ineffective. Stats aside, at least Clausen looks like he wants to take command, and he looks like he's willing to get in someone's face and yell. And that's how it looks, none of us really know how it is.

But the bottom line is that Moore is horribly ineffective without a great defense and running game. Clausen isn't particularly effective either, but at least he's got room to improve. Moore already looks like he's peaked as a player, and it was nice but not enough.

So frankly, go with the guy who has potential. When it's all you've got, you may as well stick with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not compare their college records as well?

Moore is in his fourth year, and this year was the first in which he didn't start the season buried on the depth chart. And this year we finally saw what the coaches were afraid of and why he had been buried on the depth chart.

Old games are old news. Moore did well when he had a defense that surrendered less than 10 points a game and a running game that churned out 150 yards on the ground. Take those away and he looks unprepared and ineffective. Stats aside, at least Clausen looks like he wants to take command, and he looks like he's willing to get in someone's face and yell. And that's how it looks, none of us really know how it is.

But the bottom line is that Moore is horribly ineffective without a great defense and running game. Clausen isn't particularly effective either, but at least he's got room to improve. Moore already looks like he's peaked as a player, and it was nice but not enough.

So frankly, go with the guy who has potential. When it's all you've got, you may as well stick with it.

Your entire post is complete bullshit. College career? That's what Sunday was. A college kid playing in the NFL.

The biggest difference between Moore and Clausen is that Moore is an NFL STARTER with plenty of room to improve just like Clausen, while Clausen is a COLLEGE STARTER trying to improve to become an NFL STARTER.

I'd rather have an average NFL QB than a great college QB any day of the week. Which is exactly what these two are.

Oh and Sunday, we finally saw what I and Jimmy was afraid of:

Chicago Bears defensive end Israel Idonije said he didn't talk any trash to Carolina Panthers quarterback Jimmy Clausen on Sunday as he posted three of the Bears' five sacks, because it sounded like Idonije almost felt sorry for the former Notre Dame star.

"He's a young guy, and if you looked in his eyes, he had a whole lot going on," Idonije said Monday on "The Afternoon Saloon" on ESPN 1000. "He was probably talking to himself, I'm sure."

Clausen was 9-of-22 and had a passer rating of 29.7 in a 23-6 loss.

"[At one point] he looked like he was terrorized," Idonije said. "But the guy's a young guy, he's going to be a great player in this league for many years to come. He's just having a tough rookie season, and he's going to bounce back."

http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nhl/news/story?id=5674884

No, that's how it looks. He sounds like a true nightmare to our opponents. A fearless leader no doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your entire post is complete bullshit. College career? That's what Sunday was. A college kid playing in the NFL.

The biggest difference between Moore and Clausen is that Moore is an NFL STARTER with plenty of room to improve just like Clausen, while Clausen is a COLLEGE STARTER trying to improve to become an NFL STARTER.

I'll agree--he's an NFL starter. He's also a terrible one, unless the rest of the team carries him. Find a game where he led a comeback or performed well when the rest of his team didn't, and get back to me.

I'd rather have an average NFL QB than a great college QB any day of the week. Which is exactly what these two are.
And more great college QBs become great NFL QBs, right? Who starts out perfect in your world? Moore was average in college, undrafted, and given years to develop. As soon as he got the keys for real he crapped the bed. And you have no response at all other than to call it bullshit.

Look at his wins again. All he had to do was hand the ball off for three straight quarters and not turn it over. As soon as the rules changed, he folded. I don't like it, you don't like it, the coaches don't like it, but there it is. Had he actually followed through on the promise he showed last year we would probably be sitting at 3-2 right now easily and talking playoffs.

But he disappointed, and he did so at the point in his career where he should be showing everyone what he's learned. He's had time to develop, solid experience, and the support of his team. And he failed, horribly.

So start the rookie. He's going to be scared at times. He's going to freak out at the speed of the game, and he's going to be hit harder than he ever thought he would. But he's also going to learn that he can play at that speed, and that he can get up, and that he can win in this league. And when that happens, he'll start improving and we can see the type of QB we drafted.

With Moore, we already know what we have. And that's why Clausen is starting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll agree--he's an NFL starter. He's also a terrible one, unless the rest of the team carries him. Find a game where he led a comeback or performed well when the rest of his team didn't, and get back to me.

And more great college QBs become great NFL QBs, right? Who starts out perfect in your world? Moore was average in college, undrafted, and given years to develop. As soon as he got the keys for real he crapped the bed. And you have no response at all other than to call it bullshit.

Look at his wins again. All he had to do was hand the ball off for three straight quarters and not turn it over. As soon as the rules changed, he folded. I don't like it, you don't like it, the coaches don't like it, but there it is. Had he actually followed through on the promise he showed last year we would probably be sitting at 3-2 right now easily and talking playoffs.

But he disappointed, and he did so at the point in his career where he should be showing everyone what he's learned. He's had time to develop, solid experience, and the support of his team. And he failed, horribly.

So start the rookie. He's going to be scared at times. He's going to freak out at the speed of the game, and he's going to be hit harder than he ever thought he would. But he's also going to learn that he can play at that speed, and that he can get up, and that he can win in this league. And when that happens, he'll start improving and we can see the type of QB we drafted.

With Moore, we already know what we have. And that's why Clausen is starting.

again, funny how people choose to define Moore as an NFL QB off of 5 quarters of play and completely ignore the other 34 quarters of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's bold a different section of your post:

Chicago Bears defensive end Israel Idonije said he didn't talk any trash to Carolina Panthers quarterback Jimmy Clausen on Sunday as he posted three of the Bears' five sacks, because it sounded like Idonije almost felt sorry for the former Notre Dame star.

"He's a young guy, and if you looked in his eyes, he had a whole lot going on," Idonije said Monday on "The Afternoon Saloon" on ESPN 1000. "He was probably talking to himself, I'm sure."

Clausen was 9-of-22 and had a passer rating of 29.7 in a 23-6 loss.

"[At one point] he looked like he was terrorized," Idonije said. "But the guy's a young guy, he's going to be a great player in this league for many years to come. He's just having a tough rookie season, and he's going to bounce back."

http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nh...ory?id=5674884

Sure he was scared at times, what NFL QB hasn't been? He's a rookie, and can still get better. Do you want that sort of behavior from someone who's seen it for three years already instead?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

again, funny how people choose to define Moore as an NFL QB off of 5 quarters of play and completely ignore the other 34 quarters of play.

I'm not ignoring it at all. I'm pointing out that when the game is on his back, he folds. If our defense was playing like it did late last season, and we were running the ball like we did late last season, then we would be fine with a QB of Moore's caliber. But neither is the case, and he's been exposed. Think I like it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not ignoring it at all. I'm pointing out that when the game is on his back, he folds. If our defense was playing like it did late last season, and we were running the ball like we did late last season, then we would be fine with a QB of Moore's caliber. But neither is the case, and he's been exposed. Think I like it?

but again, not sure 5 quarters is enough to know he has been exposed and is that guy. Moore is a young QB.....who got off to a very good start in this league. Moore was only given 1 game this year....that ain't a shot. Game 2 was still winnable and there is no excuse for what occured w/ Moore's benching.

you don't do what we did w/ Moore. Bottom line. Maybe he is garbage or maybe he isn't......people wanting one game to define that young of a QB are not thinking clearly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...