Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kanye now has diamond teeth


g5jamz

Recommended Posts

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1322074/Kanye-West-teeth-replaced-diamonds-They-cooler.html

article-1322074-0BAF9C4D000005DC-160_468x286.jpg

article-1322074-0BB08618000005DC-425_468x154.jpg

A fascinated Ellen asked: 'It's not a grill?'

Kanye replied: 'It's really my real teeth. I replaced my bottom row of teeth.

'I guess there's just certain things that rock stars are supposed to do.'

His earlier claims to have replaced his teeth were met with scepticism, with Kanye's fans doubting that even he would do such a thing.

But it seems they may have underestimated him.

Wonder how many will be going through his sewage in hopes of a passed dislodged diamond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may not have been real teeth anyway. Remember he had major facial reconstructive surgery after the car wreck, including major work done on he jaw. Maybe he just replaced some false teeth with a diamond encrusted bridge. Not that strange.

really?!

how many people do you know with diamonds for the bottom half of their teeth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats just a grill. He has no bottom row of teeth from the car accident he was in that almost killed him before he was famous. He wears dentures (well on the bottom anyway)

A fascinated Ellen asked: 'It's not a grill?'

Kanye replied: 'It's really my real teeth. I replaced my bottom row of teeth.

???????:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...