Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game 1: Bobcats @ Mavericks


HeatCheck

Recommended Posts

This was a bad game. I hope it's just us not being on the same page yet. Dallas has a good team though.

It's going to be a long year though. DJ looks bad, and while Felton got owned in the playoffs, I'd much rather have Felton right now. DJ needs to step it up. Nazr is just horrible, trash, a waste of a spot. I know we all hate him, but we probably should have kept Tyson. I'd honestly rather watch Diop right now than Nazr.

Then you get Jax out of the game and we have no scorers really. I'm sorry guys, I'm not sure this is going to be a playoff year, it's early though, so who knows.

And no we didn't get better, but a lot of us were hoping we'd at least be as good as last year and sneak into the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dirk was fuging 11 of 13... That is unacceptable. Hope Larry is happy. Livingston got one more contract so he could sit on his ass and suddenly have his knee flare up again.

When he plays he can't even shoot outside of 18 feet. DJ just refuses to shoot. We're fuged.

DJ left his shooting touch at Texas that's why he doesn't want 2 shoot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MJ better get some help in here quick or all this good mojo he's got going right now is gonna fizzle out.

What can he do, really? We aren't going to get rid of Wallace or TT, so the only person we have that people seem to want is Diaw. We aren't trading Diop, most people won't take Nazr even though he's expiring after this year, we have nothing people want. MJ took over a bad situation.

I'm starting to join the group of people that's wanting a new coach though. We need to blow this team up, keep Wallace and TT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...